![\"\"](\"\/Official_portrait_of_Barack_Obama.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n Since November 2008, I have been reporting many reasons why Barack Obama is apocalyptic.\u00a0 One of the reasons I gave in my article was that he would enable the rise of the European military power, while deciding that US defense spending needed to be reduced.\u00a0 This has now started to come to pass.<\/p>\n Notice the following story:<\/p>\n <\/p>\n This dangerous shift in U.S. policy is a betrayal of both U.S. and British interests that will threaten the long-term future of the Anglo-American Special Relationship, weaken the NATO alliance, and undermine the defence of British sovereignty in Europe. It will also undercut opposition across the EU to the Treaty of Lisbon, including in countries such as Ireland, Poland and the Czech Republic, and may set the scene for a major confrontation between the Obama White House and a future Conservative administration in London. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n A Eurosceptic Conservative government led by David Cameron, committed to halting further European integration, will find itself increasingly at odds with a left-of-centre U.S. administration that is actively working against the principle of national sovereignty in Europe. In light of this, the current enthusiasm of many British conservatives for the changing of the guard at the White House is hugely misplaced… <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n President Obama\u2019s government will strongly back the European Security and Defence Policy, the Lisbon Treaty and the Common Foreign and Security Policy, and will seek to strengthen French and German leadership at the heart of a united European Union. It has appointed several prominent supporters of European federalism to key positions in the Pentagon and State Department, including the new Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Mich\u00e8le Flournoy, and Philip H. Gordon, the next Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Flournoy, who holds one of the most powerful positions in the Pentagon, is a leading supporter of U.S. backing for an EU defence policy, and co-authored a major 2005 study strongly advocating American support for a unified European defence structure. Gordon, who will be the most senior administration official on Europe, has written that America must \u201csupport the European project\u201d, and that \u201cthe challenge for U.S. policy is to encourage Europe to develop the cohesion and capability to become a true transatlantic partner.\u201d <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n The Obama Administration has already made major concessions to Paris over President Sarkozy\u2019s decision for France to rejoin the NATO integrated command structure. The French have been given two major positions at the helm of the Alliance, a move that will significantly enhance the drive towards a European defence component within NATO. Vice President Joe Biden has clearly indicated that the United States will support \u201cthe further strengthening of European defense\u201d and an \u201cincreased role for the European Union in preserving peace and security.\u201d When he travels to Europe, President Obama is expected to deliver the same message. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n There is a chance the Obama Administration will eventually wake up to the reality that American support for a federal Europe will backfire. Such a naive approach will not result in European countries spending more on defence, or in a more effective Europe. It would also undermine Washington\u2019s ability to mobilize international coalitions. Under a unified EU foreign policy, U.S. allies would lose the freedom to decide where and when they can fight alongside America. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As they approach the transatlantic alliance, President Obama and his aides should heed the advice of a former prime minister and great friend of the United States who fought to defend the Special Relationship and maintain British sovereignty in Europe. As Margaret Thatcher put it, \u201cthat such an unnecessary and irrational project as building a European superstate was ever embarked upon will seem in future years to be perhaps the greatest folly of the modern era.\u201dhttp:\/\/www.telegraph.co.uk\/comment\/5005351\/Barack-Obama-will-back-a-federal-Europe.html<\/a><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n I reported earlier this week about the Obama Administration’s plans on cutting defense spending (see Russia & USA to Differ in Military Support<\/a>), hence thus far, my inclination for some of the many reasons that I feel that Barack Obama is apocalyptic are coming to pass.<\/p>\n And other apocalyptic reasons I gave that would happen under an Obama Administration such as increasing USA debt (see President Obama Forgot the Bible<\/a>) and enabling more abortions<\/a> (see Obama\u2019s Abortion Changes<\/a>) have also now come to pass.\u00a0 Actually, to a degree, all eight reasons I gave have been (see Prophecies of Barack Obama?<\/a>).<\/p>\n Bible prophecy indicates that the destruction of the United States and its Anglo-allies<\/a> is expected sometime next decade<\/a>, although it will not be before 2012<\/a>.\u00a0 And if President Obama gets re-elected, the actual destructive invasion it is likely to happen under his administration.<\/p>\n Several articles of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n Anglo – America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel<\/a> Are the Americans, Canadians, British, Scottish, Welsh, Australians, Anglo-Southern Africans, and New Zealanders descendants of Joseph? Where are the lost ten-tribes of Israel? Who are the lost tribes of Israel? Will God punish the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and other Anglo nations? Why might God allow them to be punished first? COGwriter Since November 2008, I have been reporting many reasons why Barack Obama is apocalyptic.\u00a0 One of the reasons I gave in my article was that he would enable the rise of the European military power, while deciding that US defense spending needed to be reduced.\u00a0 This has now started to come to pass. Notice […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-prophecy"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n
Barack Obama will back a federal Europe<\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
America’s support for a more united Europe betrays both US and British interests, says Nile Gardiner.<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n
Telegraph <\/strong>– March 18, 2009<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n
Barack Obama heads to Britain and Europe in two weeks\u2019 time as the leader of the first U.S. Administration to wholeheartedly back the creation of a federal Europe. In contrast to earlier U.S. administrations, including those of George W. Bush and Bill Clinton, the Obama administration is avowedly Euro-federalist in outlook, and is keen to help build a European Union defense identity as well as support the foundations of a European superstate in Brussels. <\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/a>Who is the King of the North?<\/a> Is there one? Do biblical and Roman Catholic prophecies point to the same leader? Should he be followed? Who will be the King of the North discussed in Daniel 11? Is a nuclear attack prophesied to happen to the English-speaking peoples of the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand<\/span>? When do the 1335 days, 1290 days, and 1260 days (the time, times, and half a time) of Daniel 12 begin? When does the Bible show that economic collapse will affect the United States?
\n<\/a>Does God Have a 6,000 Year Plan? What Year Does the 6,000 Years End?<\/a> Was a 6000 year time allowed for humans to rule followed by a literal thousand year reign of Christ on Earth taught by the early Christians? When does the six thousand years of human rule end?
\nCan the Great Tribulation Begin in 2009, 2010, or 2011?<\/a> Can the Great Tribulation begin today? When is the earliest that the Great Tribulation can begin? What is the Day of the Lord?
\n<\/a>End of Mayan Calendar 2012\u2013Might 2012 Mean Something?<\/a> There is a Mayan calendar prediction for change in 2012. 2012 changes were also centuries ago predicted by the Hopi Native Americans (the Hindus may have some predictions for the next decade as well). Do various Mayan\/Hindu\/Buddhist\/New Age\/Hopi prophecies have any value? Why might Satan have inspired this date? Does the Dresden codex show destruction of the earth by flood? Can the great tribulation start before 2012?
\n<\/a>Prophecies of Barack Obama?<\/a> Eight reasons why Barack Obama is apocalyptic and eight reasons why Barack Obama is not the Antichrist. Here are there biblical and non-biblical prophecies, from around the world, that seem to discuss Barack Obama. Did Nostradamus predict Barack Obama dealing with the Antichrist?\u00a0Might Barack Obama set the stage for the kings of the North and South as at least one Shiite prophecy suggests?\u00a0This is the longest and most complete article on this page on Barack Obama prophecies.
\nBarack Obama, Prophecy, and the Destruction of the United States<\/a> Some claim that Barack Obama is the prophesied \u201cson of Kenya\u201d, based up an early 20th century writing.
\nBarack Obama in Islamic Prophecy?<\/a> There is actually a 17th century Shiite prophecy that some believe that Barack Obama will fulfill that will lead to a rising up of Islam.
\nBarack Obama Carries Hindu Monkey God<\/a> Although there are some strange and false stories about Barack Obama, this one seems to be true.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"