{"id":136,"date":"2007-09-23T03:08:39","date_gmt":"2007-09-23T11:08:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/church-history\/early-church-leaders-melito-of-sardis\/"},"modified":"2007-09-23T03:13:12","modified_gmt":"2007-09-23T11:13:12","slug":"early-church-leaders-melito-of-sardis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/church-history\/early-church-leaders-melito-of-sardis\/","title":{"rendered":"Early Church Leaders: Melito of Sardis"},"content":{"rendered":"

By COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

Although Roman Catholics claim a variety of early Church leaders as their own, the truth is that they have no real proof that most of the so-called “bishops of Rome” held that office.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, even though they and the Eastern Orthodox consider that Melito of Sardis<\/a>\u00a0(of the second century) is a Christian saint, the fact is that he held doctrinal positions currently held by the COGs that are not held (and in some cases even denounced) by the Roman Catholic <\/a>and Eastern Orthodox <\/a>churches.<\/p>\n

Do you know much about Melito of Sardis<\/a>?<\/p>\n

Because if he is truly a saint like the Roman Catholic <\/a>and Eastern Orthodox <\/a>churches claim, then\u00a0if he was preaching the truth then those teachings should still held.<\/p>\n

Melito took a strong stand against violating the commandment against idolatry as he wrote:<\/font><\/p>\n

Who is this God? He who is Himself truth, and His word truth. And what is truth? That which is not fashioned, nor made, nor represented by art: that is, which has never been brought into existence, and is on that account called truth. If, therefore, a man worship that which is made with hands, it is not the truth that he worships, nor yet the word of truth…”There are, however, persons who say: It is for the honour of God that we make the image: in order, that is, that we may worship the God who is concealed from our view. But they are unaware that God is in every country, and in every place, and is never absent, and that there is not anything done and He knoweth it not. Yet thou, despicable man! within whom He is, and without whom He is, and above whom He is, hast nevertheless gone and bought thee wood from the carpenter’s, and it is carved and made into an image insulting to God. To this thou offerest sacrifice, and knowest not that the all-seeing eye seeth thee, and that the word of truth reproves thee, and says to thee: How can the unseen God be sculptured? Nay, it is the likeness of thyself that thou makest and worshippest. Because the wood has been sculptured, hast thou not the insight to perceive that it is still wood, or that the stone is still stone? The gold also the workman: taketh according to its weight in the balance. And when thou hast had it made into an image, why dose thou weigh it? Therefore thou art a lover of gold, and not a lover of God… <\/font><\/p>\n

For there are some men who are unable to rise from their mother earth, and therefore also do they make them gods. from the earth their mother; and they are condemned by the judgments of truth, forasmuch as they apply the name of Him<\/em> who is unchangeable to those objects which are subject to change, and shrink not from calling those things gods which have been made by the hands of man, and dare to make an image of God whom they have not seen <\/font>(Melito. Translation by Roberts and Donaldson. A DISCOURSE WHICH WAS IN THE PRESENCE OF ANTONINUS CAESAR, AND HE EXHORTED THE SAID CAESAR TO ACQUAINT HIMSELF WITH GOD, AND SHOWED TO HIM THE WAY OF TRUTH. Online version copyright \u00a9 2001 Peter Kirby. http:\/\/www.earlychristianwritings.com\/text\/melito.html 9\/04\/05).<\/font><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

He also wrote, <\/font><\/p>\n

We are not those who pay homage to stones, that are without sensation; but of the only God, who is before all and over all, and, moreover, we are worshippers of His Christ, who is veritably God the Word existing before all time (From the apology addressed to Marcus Aurelius Antoninus.<\/em> Verse III. Online version copyright \u00a9 2001 Peter Kirby. http:\/\/www.earlychristianwritings.com\/text\/melito.html 9\/10\/05).<\/font><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

An article of possible interest may be What Did the Early Church Teach About Idols and Icons?<\/a><\/p>\n

Even though the Catholics and Orthodox seem to worship their traditions, Melito also took a strong stand against relying on the teachings of fathers (also called Tradition<\/a>) above the truth: <\/font><\/p>\n

Again, there are persons who say: Whatsoever our fathers have bequeathed to us, that we reverence. Therefore, of course, it is, that those whose fathers have bequeathed them poverty strive to become rich! and those whose fathers did not instruct them, desire to be instructed, and to learn that which their fathers knew not! And why, forsooth, do the children of the blind see, and the children of the lame walk? Nay, it is not well for a man to follow his predecessors, if they be those whose course was evil; but rather that we should turn from that path of theirs, lest that which befell our predecessors should bring disaster upon us also. Wherefore, inquire whether thy father’s course was good: and, if so, do thou also follow in his steps; but, if thy father’s course was very evil, let thine be good, and so let it be with thy children after thee. Be grieved also for thy father because his course is evil, so long as thy grief may avail to help him. But, as for thy children, speak to them thus: There is a God, the Father of all, who never came into being, neither was ever made, and by whose will all things subsist…<\/font><\/p>\n

And then shall those who have not known God, and those who have made them idols, bemoan themselves, when they shall see those idols of theirs being burnt up, together with themselves, and nothing shall be found to help them (Melito. Translation by Roberts and Donaldson. A DISCOURSE WHICH WAS IN THE PRESENCE OF ANTONINUS CAESAR, AND HE EXHORTED THE SAID CAESAR TO ACQUAINT HIMSELF WITH GOD, AND SHOWED TO HIM THE WAY OF TRUTH. Online version copyright \u00a9 2001 Peter Kirby. http:\/\/www.earlychristianwritings.com\/text\/melito.html 9\/04\/05). <\/font><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Notice that Melito clearly condemned those who made idols and apply the name of God to them. Notice that he also taught that believing they are acceptable because of the traditions of fathers is in error.<\/p>\n

The Catholic Encyclopedia<\/em> notes, <\/font><\/p>\n

…a large number of Christians of the post-Apostolic era, particularly in Asia Minor, yielded so far to Jewish apocalyptic as to put a literal meaning into these descriptions of St. John’s Apocalypse; the result was that millenarianism spread and gained staunch advocates not only among the heretics but among the Catholic Christians as well…Papias of Hierapolis, a disciple of St. John, appeared as an advocate of millenarianism. He claimed to have received his doctrine from contemporaries of the Apostles…A witness for the continued belief in millenarianism in the province of Asia is St. Melito, Bishop of Sardes in the second century<\/strong> (Kirsch J.P. Transcribed by Donald J. Boon. Millennium and Millenarianism. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume X. Copyright \u00a9 1911 by Robert Appleton Company. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2003 by K. Knight. Nihil Obstat, October 1, 1911. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York).<\/font><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yet the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches also teaches against this.<\/font><\/p>\n

Notice the following two items:<\/p>\n

676<\/strong> The Antichrist’s deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgment. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the “intrinsically perverse” political form of a secular messianism. (Catechism of the Catholic Church. Imprimatur Potest +Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. Doubleday, NY 1995).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

CHILIASM: Chiliasm, from the Greek word meaning “1000,” is a belief based on Revelation 20:2-7. In its classical form (which interprets the Revelation 20 verses verbatim), Chiliasm teaches that Satan will be bound by Christ for 1000 years, at which time Jesus and the Saints will reign on earth, and after which, Satan will be finally defeated and the Eternal Kingdom of God will be inaugurated. In modern times, Chiliasm has been “boiled down” to the teaching that the world will end after one thousand years (or a number of years that is a multiple of one thousand). Though some Ancient Church Fathers of the first three centuries AD had Chiliast leanings, the Orthodox Church formally denounced Chiliasm at the Second Ecumenical Council, in 381 (Orthodox Christian Beliefs and Practices. \u00a9 2006-2007 Ukrainian Orthodox Church of Canada. http:\/\/www.uocc.ca\/en-ca\/faith\/beliefs\/ 08\/18\/07).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words, both groups condemn Melito’s teaching on this.\u00a0 Orthodox Church scholars know that early Christian leaders, which it calls, “Ancient Church Fathers” taught chiliasm (called millenarianism in Latin), yet it CHANGED that teaching in a church council. Roman Catholic scholars know this as well More information can be found in the article Did The Early Church Millenarianism?<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, Melito held many other COG doctrines.\u00a0 Many doctrines that are now opposed by the Roman Catholic <\/a>and Eastern Orthodox <\/a>churches.<\/p>\n

More information can be found in the article Melito of Sardis<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By COGwriter Although Roman Catholics claim a variety of early Church leaders as their own, the truth is that they have no real proof that most of the so-called “bishops of Rome” held that office. Furthermore, even though they and the Eastern Orthodox consider that Melito of Sardis\u00a0(of the second century) is a Christian saint, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church-history"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t