![\"\"](\"\/lateran.jpg\")
\nLateran Cathedral<\/p>\n
\nLateran Cathedral<\/p>\n
COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n Pope Francis spoke about the Lateran Cathedral as well as his ecumenical agenda today:<\/p>\n November 9, 2014<\/p>\n The Holy Father began his address recalling the Dedication of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, which the Catholic Church celebrates today.<\/p>\n The Basilica is the Cathedral Church of Rome and the ecclesiastical seat of its Bishop, the Pope. Dedicated by Pope Sylvester I in 324, it is the oldest church in the West.<\/p>\n Noting that the basilica is known as the \u201cmother of all Churches\u201d, the Pope said that this term not only refers to the building itself, but the \u201cwork of the Holy Spirit that is manifested\u201d through the ministry of the Bishop of Rome, in unity with the Church around the world.<\/p>\n \u201cThis unity presents the nature of a universal family, and as there is a mother in a family, so does the venerated Cathedral of Lateran become a \u2018mother\u2019 to the churches of all the communities of the Catholic world,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cWith this feast, therefore, we profess, in the unity of the faith, the bond of communion that all the local Churches, spread throughout the earth, has with the Church of Rome and with its Bishop, the successor to Peter.\u201d<\/p>\n The Holy Father also noted that the building itself is a sign of the Church alive in the world, made up of men and women and in which Christ is the living stone. This sign, he continued, calls all Christians to be consistent in their lives “with the gift of faith and Christian witness.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cIt is not easy, we all know, the consistency in life between faith and witness,\u201d he said. \u201cBut we should go forward and have daily consistency in our lives. This is a Christian! Not so much for what he says, but for what he does, for the way in which he acts. This coherence, which gives us life, is a grace of the Holy Spirit that we should ask for.\u201d<\/p>\n Prior to praying the Angelus with the faithful, the Pope reminded the faithful that today\u2019s feast is an invitation to reflect on the communion of the Church around world. This communion is a motivation for Christians to overcome barriers of indifference and \u201cbuild bridges of understanding and dialogue.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe Church Herself,\u201d he explained, \u201cis a sign and an anticipation of this new humanity, when it lives and spreads the Gospel with Her witness, a message of hope and reconciliation for all mankind.\u201d\u00a0http:\/\/www.zenit.org\/en\/articles\/pope-francis-we-need-bridges-not-walls<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n As far as building bridges, it should be pointed out that the title Pontifex Maximus means literally means greatest bridge-builder.\u00a0 The pagan Roman Emperors held that title as they attempted to unify a variety of pagan religions into a faith that would be at least partially accepted throughout that empire.\u00a0 Pope Francis seems to be trying to do the same for the world.<\/p>\n Here is more from Pope Francis today:<\/p>\n November 9, 2017<\/p>\n Here is the translation of the Holy Father’s address before and after praying the Angelus with the faithful gathered in St. Peter’s Square today.<\/p>\n Dear brothers and sisters, good morning!<\/p>\n Today the liturgy recalls the Dedication of the Lateran Basilica, the cathedral of Rome, that tradition defines as \u201cthe mother of all Churches of \u201cUrbe et Orbe\u201d[the City and the World]. The word \u201cmother\u201d refers not only to the sacred edifice of the Basilica, but to the work of the Holy Spirit that is manifested in this building, bearing fruit through the ministry of the Bishop of Rome, in all the communities that remain in unity with the Church which it presides over. This unity presents the nature of a universal family, and as there is a mother in a family, so does the venerated Cathedral of Lateran become a \u201cmother\u201d to the churches of all the communities of the Catholic world.<\/p>\n With this feast, therefore, we profess, in the unity of the faith, the bond of communion that all the local Churches, spread throughout the earth, has with the Church of Rome and with its Bishop, the successor to Peter. \u00a0http:\/\/www.zenit.org\/en\/articles\/on-the-feast-of-the-lateran-basilica<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Here is what is shown in Latin in several places on the outside of that building:<\/p>\n Below it is translated from the Latin into English:<\/p>\n Sacred Lateran Church<\/strong> Mother and Head of All Churches of the City and the World<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is the Basilica of St. John Lateran<\/strong> is the cathedral of the Bishop of Rome, that contains its papal throne (Cathedra Romana<\/em>), and is the official ecclesiastical seat of the Pope (it ranks above all other churches in the Roman Catholic Church, even above St. Peter\u2019s Basilica in the Vatican).<\/p>\n So it is clear that the Vatican claims to be the Mother of the World\u2019s Churches. And the Bible teaches Babylon certainly is the Mother of the WORLD\u2019s churches (Revelation 17:4-6). However, it is NOT the mother of the Church of God which preceded the formation of the Church of Rome (see The Churches of Revelation 2 & 3<\/a> and Location of the Early Church: Another Look at Ephesus, Smyrna, and Rome<\/a>) and did not come from the Church of Rome.\u00a0 Historically, the Church of Rome has tended to consider those in groups like the Continuing<\/em> Church of God<\/a> as apostates, and will do so in the future.\u00a0 It is those of the Greco-Roman persuasion that the current ecumenical movement considers to be \u2018Christian,\u2019 but the ecumenical movement errs in that as well (to learn more about the history of true Christianity, check out the free booklet (The Continuing History of the Church of God)<\/a>.<\/p>\n Those who accept Rome as their \u2018mother church\u2019 do so to their peril.<\/p>\n Some, who do accept Rome, are having problems with Pope Francis, and he took steps against one of his critics:<\/p>\n November 9, 2014<\/p>\n Pope Francis on Saturday demoted an outspoken conservative American cardinal who has been highly critical of the pontiff’s reformist leadership of the Roman Catholic Church.<\/p>\n Cardinal Raymond Burke, 66, was removed as head of the Vatican’s highest court and appointed to the ceremonial post of chaplain of the charity group Knights of Malta.<\/p>\n The move, which the Vatican announced on Saturday without comment, had been expected. Burke said last month he had been told he would move to a new job, but did not know when.<\/p>\n Burke, who until Saturday was the highest-ranking American in the Vatican, gave a series of recent interviews criticizing the pope and had emerged as the face of conservative opposition to Francis’ reform agenda.<\/p>\n In an interview with a Spanish magazine last month, Burke, known for his unbending interpretation of doctrine, compared the Catholic Church under Francis to “a ship without a rudder.”<\/p>\n At a meeting of bishops from around the world last month, Burke was the flag-bearer for conservatives opposed to the Church adopting a more welcoming attitude toward homosexuals. \u00a0http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/news\/nationworld\/chi-pope-demotes-conservative-cardinal-20141108-story.html<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Notice also the following headlines and comments:<\/p>\n Writing on his diocesan website, Bishop Thomas Tobin accused<\/a> Francis of being fond of \u201cmaking a mess\u201d and stated that the Synod voting concept \u201cstruck [him] as being rather Protestant.\u201d A funny argument, since Catholic bishops have been voting on key issues since the Council of Nicaea in 325, but that\u2019s beside the point. Tobin seems to be suggesting that with Francis at the helm, the Catholic Church is no longer acting like the Catholic Church.<\/p>\n For over a year conservative Catholics have had their chastity belts in a twist over Francis and apparently, the chafing has finally grown too much to bear.<\/p>\n Over at The New York Times<\/em>, columnist Ross Douthat, a convert to Roman Catholicism, warned that Francis\u2019s current path could \u201ceventually lead to real schism.\u201d With the threat of schism hanging in the air he then encourages a kind of rebellion: \u201cTrue Catholics,\u201d he writes, must \u201cresist\u201d the Pope\u2019s pressure to change the Church.<\/p>\n Other conservatives agree<\/a>, pointing to Paul\u2019s Letter to the Galatians, in which the upstart self-proclaimed Apostle Paul describes a meeting when he called out Peter\u2014the first Pope\u2014for hypocrisy. To his face and everything. According to Paul, Peter backed down. Now traditionalists want to use this as a precedent for calling out the Pope when he\u2019s not Pope-y enough.<\/p>\n Writing on his diocesan website, Bishop Thomas Tobin accused<\/a> Francis of being fond of \u201cmaking a mess\u201d and stated that the Synod voting concept \u201cstruck [him] as being rather Protestant.\u201d A funny argument, since Catholic bishops have been voting on key issues since the Council of Nicaea in 325, but that\u2019s beside the point. Tobin seems to be suggesting that with Francis at the helm, the Catholic Church is no longer acting like the Catholic Church.<\/p>\n For over a year conservative Catholics have had their chastity belts in a twist over Francis and apparently, the chafing has finally grown too much to bear.<\/p>\n Over at The New York Times<\/em>, columnist Ross Douthat, a convert to Roman Catholicism, warned that Francis\u2019s current path could \u201ceventually lead to real schism.\u201d With the threat of schism hanging in the air he then encourages a kind of rebellion: \u201cTrue Catholics,\u201d he writes, must \u201cresist\u201d the Pope\u2019s pressure to change the Church.<\/p>\n Other conservatives agree<\/a>, pointing to Paul\u2019s Letter to the Galatians, in which the upstart self-proclaimed Apostle Paul describes a meeting when he called out Peter\u2014the first Pope\u2014for hypocrisy. To his face and everything. According to Paul, Peter backed down. Now traditionalists want to use this as a precedent for calling out the Pope when he\u2019s not Pope-y enough.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n If Pope Francis is truly the last pope, and that is not clear yet, he would not truly be Catholic. Notice some statements from my book The Last Pope: Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis?<\/a>:<\/p>\n Is the Pope Catholic or Will He Betray Rome?<\/strong><\/p>\n In some households, the expression, \u201cIs the Pope Catholic?,\u201d is asked with the intent of suggesting a \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cobviously yes\u201d response to a question. Since the fourth century, the popes have all claimed to be Catholic (they were not called \u201cpontifex maximus\u201d prior to then) and the vast majority have been Roman Catholic in their faith. Some were more hypocritical, etc. and thus this author would be hesitant to claim that all the Bishops of Rome have truly held to the faith of that church.<\/p>\n But is it possible that the last pope, who could be Pope Francis I, will not be Roman Catholic? On the surface this seems absurd.<\/p>\n As discussed in chapter 2, prior to becoming Pope Francis I, Jorge Mario Bergoglio went to Catholic seminary, became a Catholic priest, then a bishop, then a cardinal, and then on March 13, 2013, the Bishop of Rome. So, to most he clearly is a Catholic. And Pope Francis I may well truly be.<\/p>\n But if he is the last and final pope, then the Bible shows that he will allow compromise mightily and allow the Catholic Church of Rome to be betrayed, hence suggesting that he would not then be true to the Catholic faith.<\/p>\n Connecting the Dots<\/strong><\/p>\n As cited earlier, the Bible tells of a religious leader who will rise up and support the final European Beast power to the point of attempting to force people to worship that Beast (Revelation 13:11-17).<\/p>\n Although some have suggested that the ten-horned Beast of the Sea (Revelation 13:1-4) will turn against and burn the two-horned Beast of the Earth (Revelation 13:11), based upon the teachings of Revelation 17:16-17, since this two-horned Beast is the False Prophet of Revelation 16:13 and he gets burnt by Jesus and His angels (Revelation 19:15-21, someone or something else must get destroyed in Revelation 17.<\/p>\n The Bible specifies that the someone\/something is a city that rules over the world. Since the time of Jesus, what are the only organizations that ruled over much of the old Roman Empire from a seven-hilled city?<\/p>\n They would include the old Roman Empire, the Church of Rome, and to a lessor degree, the Eastern Orthodox Church (Constantinople\/ Istanbul is on seven-hills, similar to Rome and had a certain prominence for about 1,000 years). They have had relations with world rulers that have not always lived up to New Testament ideals and actually are the only ones that could possibly fit the historical record. Now since parts of both Roman and Orthodox Catholic prophecy show that Rome wins out between the two in the end in terms of final top leader, this is consistent with the historical understanding within the Church of God that Rome is the unfaithful woman in Revelation 17. Presuming that is the case, then if one connects-the-dots, it is the Church of Rome that gets betrayed by supporters of the ten-horned Beast in Revelation 17. And since the two-horned Beast is a major supporter of the ten-horned Beast, he then has at least some responsibility in this end time destruction of the Church of Rome (for more dots to connect, see also chapters 5 and 12).<\/p>\n Since it should be almost inconceivable that a pope that was truly Roman Catholic in the sense of the Catechism of the Catholic Church<\/em> would totally betray his church, this is why I am suggesting that the last pope will not truly be Catholic.<\/p>\n This destruction of Rome is consistent with various Catholic private prophecies that suggest that a top Roman clergy member (like a pope) would betray their church and oversee the destruction of Rome\u2026<\/p>\n For years I have believed that the last pope would not truly be Catholic. He would be a different type of \u201cantipope\u201d (most antipopes occurred because of disputed elections, but I have suggested that a pontiff who does not hold too many of the core beliefs of the Church of Rome would also seem to fit the definition of an antipope). Will Pope Francis I end up being that pontiff?<\/p>\n (Thiel B. The Last Pope: Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis? Nazarene Books, 2013, pp. 86-89)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The above was written within ONE DAY of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio becoming Pope Francis.<\/p>\n Pope Francis has taken several steps that many Catholics do not believe are appropriate for the Bishop of Rome. Yet, most believe that they cannot go anywhere else as they improperly believe that the Church of Rome is the original church that Jesus founded through His apostles. Francis today alluded to a type of succession from the Apostle Peter that Rome simply does not have (see also Apostolic Succession<\/a> ).<\/p>\n Those interested in learning which church actually is faithful and has proper succession from the original church that Jesus founded, should carefully study the article Which Is Faithful: The Roman Catholic Church or the Continuing<\/em> Church of God?<\/a>.\u00a0 More information can also be found in the free online pdf booklets\u00a0Continuing History of the Church of God<\/a> and Where is the True Christian Church Today?<\/a><\/p>\n Pope Francis keeps pushing his Babylonian version of ecumenical unity.\u00a0 But the Bible shows that it is after Babylon falls and Jesus returns that true Christian unity will occur (Zechariah 2:10-11). Do not be deceived by the Babylonian ecumenical movement–it is not biblical and will lead to destruction (Revelation 17-19).<\/p>\n Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n Anti-Pope Francis?<\/a> Some cardinals and other members of the Roman Catholic clergy are concerned that Pope Francis has deviated from its traditional positions on matters such as homosexuality, salvation, fornication, remarriage, and other doctrines. Australian Cardinal George Pell even mentioned ‘antipopes’ when discussing Pope Francis. North American Cardinal Raymond Burke has raised many concerns about Francis’ pontificate. Did Catholic saints teach that popes could become heretics? Will the final pope not be Catholic? Is an ecumenical pontiff possibly the final Antichrist? What do both biblical, and even Roman Catholic, prophecies warn about? Could Pope Francis be an antipope and final Antichrist?\u00a0 This is a new video. Lateran Cathedral COGwriter Pope Francis spoke about the Lateran Cathedral as well as his ecumenical agenda today: November 9, 2014 The Holy Father began his address recalling the Dedication of the Basilica of St. John Lateran, which the Catholic Church celebrates today. The Basilica is the Cathedral Church of Rome and the ecclesiastical seat of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-religious-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/Ecclesiarum_Mater_San_Giovanni_in_Laterano.jpg\")
\nInscription in the Basilica of St. John Lateran<\/p>\n\n
Is the Pope Catholic? Critics Rally Around Benedict As Talk of Schism Looms<\/a><\/h2>\n
Reform in Rome – will Pope Francis<\/strong> get his way?<\/a><\/h2>\n
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nWhy Should American Catholics Fear Unity with the Orthodox?<\/a> Are the current ecumenical meetings a good thing or will they result in disaster? Is doctrinal compromise good? Here is a link to a related video Should you be concerned about the ecumenical movement? <\/a>
\nUnited Nations: Humankind\u2019s Last Hope or New World Order?<\/a> Is the UN the last hope for humanity? Or might its goals end up with sinister results? A related video would be United Nations and Vatican Are Planning the New World Order<\/a>.
\nPope Francis: Could this Marian Focused Pontiff be Fulfilling Prophecy?<\/a> Pope Francis has taken many steps to turn people more towards his version of \u2018Mary.\u2019 Could this be consistent with biblical and Catholic prophecies? This article documents what has been happening. There is also a video version titled Pope Francis: Could this Marian Focused Pontiff be Fulfilling Prophecy?<\/a>
\n<\/a>Mary, the Mother of Jesus and the Apparitions<\/a> Do you know much about Mary? Are the apparitions real? What happened at Fatima? What might they mean for the rise of the ecumenical religion of Antichrist? Are Protestants moving towards Mary? How do the Eastern\/Greek Orthodox view Mary? How might Mary view her adorers? Here is a link to a YouTube video Marian Apparitions May Fulfill Prophecy. <\/a> Here is a link to a sermon video: Why Learn About Fatima?<\/a>
\nWere the Early Duties of Elders\/Pastors Mainly Sacramental? What was there Dress?<\/a> Were the duties of the clergy primarily pastoral or sacramental? Did the clergy dress with special liturgical vestments? Can “bishops” be disqualified as ministers of Christ based on their head coverings?
\nMarcus, the Marcosians, & Mithraism: Developers of the Eucharist?<\/a> Marcus was a second century heretic condemned for having a ceremony similar to one still practiced by many who profess Christ. Might he also be in the apostolic succession<\/a> list of the Orthodox Church of Alexandria? Where did the eucharistic host and IHS come from?
\nSimon Magus, What Did He Teach?<\/a> Sometimes called “the father early heretics” or the “father of heresies”, do you know what early writers claimed that Simon Magus taught? Sadly, most who profess Christ still hold to versions of his teachings.
\nWill the Interfaith Movement Lead to Peace or Sudden Destruction?<\/a> Is the interfaith movement going to lead to lasting peace or is it warned against?
\nBeware: Protestants Going Towards Ecumenical Destruction!<\/a> What is going on in the Protestant world? Are Protestants turning back to their \u2018mother church\u2019 in Rome? Does the Bible warn about this? What are Catholic plans and prophecies related to this? Is Protestantism doomed?
\nDo You Know That Babylon is Forming?<\/a> How is the final Babylon forming? Are Protestants such as Joel Osteen and Kenneth Copeland are endorsing something dangerous? Could Pope Francis be the \u2018False Prophet\u2019 that the Bible warns against? Is an antipope expected to endorse a one-world religion? Here is a link to a related written article In Vatican City: New Babylon more openly forming!<\/a>
\nPope Francis: Could this Marian Focused Pontiff be Fulfilling Prophecy?<\/a> Pope Francis has taken many steps to turn people more towards his version of \u2018Mary.\u2019 Could this be consistent with biblical and Catholic prophecies? This article documents what has been happening. There is also a video version titled Pope Francis: Could this Marian Focused Pontiff be Fulfilling Prophecy?<\/a>
\n<\/a> Which Is Faithful: The Roman Catholic Church or the Continuing<\/em> Church of God?<\/a> Do you know that both groups shared a lot of the earliest teachings? Do you know which church changed? Do you know which group is most faithful to the teachings of the apostolic church? Which group best represents true Christianity? This documented article answers those questions.
\nWhere is the True Christian Church Today?<\/a> This free online pdf booklet answers that question and includes 18 proofs, clues, and signs to identify the true vs. false Christian church. Plus 7 proofs, clues, and signs to help identify Laodicean churches. A related sermon is also available: Where is the True Christian Church?<\/a>
\n<\/strong>Continuing History of the Church of God<\/a> This pdf booklet is a historical overview of the true Church of God and some of its main opponents from c. 31 A.D. to 2014. A related sermon link would be Continuing History of the Church of God: c. 31 to c. 300 A.D<\/a>. Marque aqu\u00ed para ver el pdf folleto: Continuaci\u00f3n de la Historia de la Iglesia de Dios<\/a>.
\nCould Pope Francis be the Last Pope and Antichrist?<\/a> According to some interpretations of the prophecies of the popes by the Catholic saint and Bishop Malachy, Pope Francis I is in the position of \u201cPeter the Roman,\u201d the pontiff who reigns during tribulations until around the time of the destruction of Rome. Do biblical prophecies warn of someone that sounds like Peter the Roman? Could Francis I be the heretical antipope of Catholic private prophecies and the final Antichrist of Bible prophecy? This is a YouTube video.
\nThe Last Pope Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis?<\/em><\/a> Why might Pope Francis be the last pope? What happens if he is? Biblical and other prophecies help explain what to expect.
\nThe Last Pope: Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis? Amazon Book<\/a> What does the Bible say about a pope near this time? Is the final pope to be an antipope and antichrist? Does Catholic prophecy point to Pope Francis as being the dreaded “Peter the Roman”? This 186 page book provides information and answers.
\nThe Last Pope: Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis? Kindle <\/a>This electronic version of the printed book which is available for only US$2.99. And you do not need an actual Kindle device to read it. Why? Amazon will allow you to download it to almost any device: Please click HERE to download one of Amazon \u0019s Free<\/strong> Reader Apps<\/a>. After you go to for your free Kindle reader and then go to The Last Pope: Do Biblical and Catholic Prophecies Point to Pope Francis? Kindle. <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"