{"id":52713,"date":"2020-01-10T00:01:08","date_gmt":"2020-01-10T08:01:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=52713"},"modified":"2020-01-10T05:24:34","modified_gmt":"2020-01-10T13:24:34","slug":"hyginus-did-this-roman-leader-try-to-change-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/church-history\/hyginus-did-this-roman-leader-try-to-change-times\/","title":{"rendered":"Hyginus: Did this Roman leader try to change times?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nVatican City (photo by Joyce Thiel)<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

January 11th is the feast day of the Church of Rome for a leader called Hyginus<\/a><\/span>. Although the claimed early leaders of Rome in the Catholic “succession lists” refer to him as a pope, that title was not used by leaders there until the latter part of the fourth century.<\/p>\n

The generally touted Catholic position is that Hyginus was the ninth pope and that all subsequent leaders of the true church passed through him. Is that correct? <\/span><\/p>\n

Certain Claims <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

While visiting the Vatican in 2004, I purchased a book in its basilica museum bookstore titled The Popes: The lives of the pontiffs through 2000 years of history<\/em> (Lopes A. The Popes: The lives of the pontiffs through 2000 years of history. Futura Edizoni, Roma, 1997). The book states that it is sponsored by the “Pontifical Administration, which has tutelage over the Patriarchal Basilica of St. Peter”. <\/span><\/p>\n

It makes many claims about the early “bishops” of Rome including this about Hyginus:<\/span><\/p>\n

9. HYGINUS, ST. (136-140) <\/strong>Born in Athens, he was considered a philosopher and he behaved like one…During the baptism of children, he ordered the presence of a godfather or a godmother who would guide and direct them in leading a Christian life. He ordered that churches should be dedicated. His pontificate was marked by persecution and his martyrdom (Lopes A. The Popes: The lives of the pontiffs through 2000 years of history. Futura Edizoni, Roma, 1997, p. 3).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Catholic Encyclopedia <\/em>notes this about him:<\/span><\/p>\n

The ancient authorities contain no information as to his having died a martyr (Kirsch J.P. Transcribed by Joseph P. Thomas.The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume VII. Copyright \u00a9 1910 by Robert Appleton Company. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2003 by K. Knight. Nihil Obstat, June 1, 1910. Remy Lafort, S.T.D., Censor. Imprimatur. +John Cardinal Farley, Archbishop of New York).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is also no evidence that he came up with godparents or requiring churches to be dedicated. Actually, these are unlikely to have been done then. Essentially, the Roman Catholics now teach that the godparent repents and accepts Christ on the behalf of infants that they baptize\u2014godparents are part of the justification they have for infant baptism (please see article on Baptism<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n

For example, The Catholic Encyclopedia<\/em> notes:<\/span><\/p>\n

When infants are solemnly baptized, persons assist at the ceremony to make profession of the faith in the child’s name. This practice comes from antiquity and is witnessed to by Tertullian, St. Basil, St. Augustine, and others. Such persons are designated sponsores, offerentes, susceptores, fidejussores,<\/em> and patrini<\/em>. The English term is godfather and godmother, or in Anglo-Saxon, gossip <\/em>(Fanning W.H.W. Transcribed by Charles Sweeney, S.J. The Catholic Encyclopedia, Volume II. Copyright \u00a9 1907 by Robert Appleton Company. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2003 by K. Knight. Imprimatur. +John M. Farley, Archbishop of New York). <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Note that Hyginus is not listed as coming up with this as many Catholic scholars realize that there simply was no record that he did. <\/span><\/p>\n

It is of interest to note that:<\/span><\/p>\n

…the Gnostic Valentine came to Rome in Hyginus’s time, remaining there until Anicetus (Ibid). <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

According to the Catholic historian Eusebius, it was Polycarp of Smyrna<\/a> who had to deal with that heretic as Hyginus apparently did not. This helps show that it was the leadership in Asia Minor, which at that time was clearly “Church of God,” that dealt with various heresies and heretics that the Church of Rome tolerated.<\/span><\/p>\n

According to Tertullian, the Church of Rome tolerated Valentinus <\/a>for decades after he was denounced by Polycarp of Smyra.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Easter Sunday<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Bible has the following warning:<\/p>\n

25 He shall speak pompous words against the Most High, Shall persecute the saints of the Most High, And shall intend to change times and law. (Daniel 7:25)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

While that still has a future application, to a degree, this happened with one or more Roman leaders in the second century.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Although most who profess Christianity now celebrate it, Easter-Sunday <\/a>was not observed by the second century Christians in Asia Minor. They observed Passover<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n

The date was improperly changed.<\/p>\n

Beginning with possibly the Roman leader Telesphorus<\/a> or possibly Hyginus (or possibly Sixtus<\/a>, there are no contemporaneous records, only an unclear report 5-6 decades later written by Irenaeus<\/a>), what is now called Easter began to be observed in Rome. First, it was apparently a change in the date of Passover from the 14th of Nisan to a Sunday. This is believed to have happened because there was a rebellion by Jews and that any distancing between Jews and Christians seemed physically advantageous (at least to some in Rome and the Greeks in Jerusalem). It was due to cowardice and antisemitism that the Sunday date was chosen (the fact that cowards often were killed anyway, does not prove they were not cowards).<\/span><\/p>\n

The late SDA scholar Samuele Bacchiocchi noted that the change to Easter-Sunday and to a weekly Sunday was due to persecution (the new Gentile hierarchy<\/em> he is referring to are Greek bishops in Jerusalem, which took over after the rebellion was crushed):<\/span><\/p>\n

The actual introduction of Easter-Sunday appears to have occurred earlier in Palestine after Emperor Hadrian ruthlessly crushed the Barkokeba revolt (A.D. 132-135)…<\/span><\/p>\n

The fact that the Passover controversy arose when Emperor Hadrian adopted new repressive measures against Jewish religious practices suggests that such measures influenced the new Gentile hierarchy to change the date of Passover from Nisan 14 to the following Sunday (Easter-Sunday) in order to show separation and differentiation from the Jews and the Jewish Christians…<\/span><\/p>\n

A whole body of Against the Jews<\/em> literature was produced by leading Fathers who defamed the Jews as a people and emptied their religious beliefs and practices of any historical value. Two major causalities of the anti-Jewish campaign were Sabbath and Passover. The Sabbath was changed to Sunday and Passover was transferred to Easter-Sunday. <\/span><\/p>\n

Scholars usually recognize the anti-Judaic motivation for the repudiation of the Jewish reckoning of Passover and adoption of Easter-Sunday instead. Joachim Jeremias attributes such a development to “the inclination to break away from Judaism.” In a similar vein, J.B. Lightfoot explains that Rome and Alexandria adopted Easter-Sunday to avoid “even the semblance of Judaism” (Bacchiocchi S. God’s Festival in Scripture and History. Biblical Perspectives. Befriend Springs (MI), 1995, pp. 101,102,103). <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It is likely that Telesphorus made this change at the time to attempt to distance himself from the Jews in Rome. If he was the one who did it, and if he thought that this would spare his life, he was wrong as he was later killed by the Roman authorities (circa 136 A.D.). On the other hand, it is perhaps more likely that it was Hyginus, who was also possibly Greek, that decided to introduce the Passover Sunday tradition, perhaps to decrease the wrath of the anti-Jewish Roman authorities. <\/span><\/p>\n

Since Anicetus’ account claimed that this practice was begun by presbyters who preceded him (see Easter<\/a>), it would need to have been no later than the Greeks Telesphorus or Hyginus, as they were followed by Pius who was then followed by Anicetus (it probably did not originate with Sixtus as he preceded Telesphorus, he was not believed to have been Greek, and he was dead, if he even existed, circa 125 A.D.).<\/span><\/p>\n

It is probable that Hyginus either began, continued, or started the practice of observing Passover on a Sunday, but there is no specific information that proves he did. But if he did, he obviously is not someone who should be celebrated by Christians as the Bible teaches that Passover was held on the 14th of Nisan.<\/span><\/p>\n

Historical records demonstrate that the Apostles John and Philip, as well as their spiritual descendants in Asia Minor, did not change or compromise on this point–they continued to follow the Bible. But Hyginus might have compromised, and the Church of Rome at some point in time most certainly did.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n

Apostolic Succession<\/a> What really happened? Did structure and beliefs change? Are many of the widely-held current understandings of this even possible? Did you know that Catholic scholars really do not believe that several of the claimed “apostolic sees” of the Orthodox have apostolic succession–despite the fact that the current pontiff himself seems to wish to ignore this view? Is there actually a true church that has ties to any of the apostles that is not part of the Catholic or Orthodox churches? Read this article if you truly are interested in the truth on this matter! Here is a link to a sermon: Claims of Apostolic Succession<\/a>. Here is a related articlein the Spanish language La sucesi\u00f3n apost\u00f3lica. \u00bfOcurri\u00f3 en Roma, Alejandr\u00eda, Constantinopla, Antioqu\u00eda, Jerusal\u00e9n o Asia Menor?<\/a>
\n“Pope” Hyginus<\/a> (136-140) He is claimed to have come up with the idea of “godparents”. He may have been involved in the institution of a Sunday Passover. The heretic Valentinus appeared by his time.
\nLaying on of Hands<\/a> This is an elementary principle of Hebrews 6. Have you properly had hands laid upon you? Here is a link to a related sermon: Laying on of Hands and Succession<\/a>.<\/span>
\nWhich Is Faithful: The Roman Catholic Church or the Continuing<\/em> Church of God?<\/a> Do you know that both groups shared a lot of the earliest teachings? Do you know which church changed? Do you know which group is most faithful to the teachings of the apostolic church? Which group best represents true Christianity? This documented article answers those questions.
\nNazarene Christianity: Were the Original Christians Nazarenes?<\/a> Should Christians be Nazarenes today? What were the practices of the Nazarenes.
\nLocation of the Early Church: Another Look at Ephesus, Smyrna, and Rome<\/a> What actually happened to the primitive Church? And did the Bible tell about this in advance?
\nPassover and the Early Church<\/a> Did the early Christians observe Passover? What did Jesus and Paul teach? Why did Jesus die for our sins? There is also a detailed YouTube video available titled History of the Christian Passover<\/a>.
\nThe Passover Plot<\/a> What was the first Passover plot? Which plots have Islam and the Greco-Roman faiths perpetuated about Passover? A sermon video of related interest is The Passover Plots, Including Easter<\/a>.
\nDid Early Christians Celebrate Easter?<\/a> If not, when did this happen? What do scholars and the Bible reveal?
\nBaptism and the Early Church<\/a> Was it by immersion? Did it include infants? Does Polycarp prove infant baptism?
\nWhere is the True Christian Church Today?<\/a> This free online pdf booklet answers that question and includes 18 proofs, clues, and signs to identify the true vs. false Christian church. Plus 7 proofs, clues, and signs to help identify Laodicean churches. A related sermon is also available: Where is the True Christian Church? <\/a>Here is a link to the booklet in the Spanish language: \u00bfD\u00f3nde est\u00e1 la verdadera Iglesia cristiana de hoy?<\/a> Here is a link in the German language: WO IST DIE WAHRE CHRISTLICHE KIRCHE HEUTE?<\/a> Here is a link in the French language: O\u00f9 est la vraie \u00c9glise Chr\u00e9tienne aujourd\u2019hui?<\/a>
\nContinuing History of the Church of God<\/a> This pdf booklet is a historical overview of the true Church of God and some of its main opponents from Acts 2 to the 21st century. Related sermon links include Continuing History of the Church of God: c. 31 to c. 300 A.D<\/a>. and Continuing History of the Church of God: 4th-16th Centuries<\/a>. The booklet is available in Spanish: Continuaci\u00f3n de la Historia de la Iglesia de Dios<\/a>, German: Kontinuierliche Geschichte der Kirche Gottes<\/a>, and Ekegusii Omogano Bw\u2019ekanisa Ya Nyasae Egendererete<\/a>.
\n<\/b><\/strong>The History of Early Christianity<\/a> Are you aware that what most people believe is not what truly happened to the true Christian church? Do you know where the early church was based? Do you know what were the doctrines of the early church? Is your faith really based upon the truth or compromise?<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Vatican City (photo by Joyce Thiel) COGwriter January 11th is the feast day of the Church of Rome for a leader called Hyginus. Although the claimed early leaders of Rome in the Catholic “succession lists” refer to him as a pope, that title was not used by leaders there until the latter part of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church-history"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t