![\"\"](\"\/expelled.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n As a scientist, I have long known that proponents of evolution treat the subject more like a religious view than a scientific theory. This is somewhat also what the Ben Stein movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed<\/em> revealed years ago (see Ben Stein\u2019s Expelled<\/a>).<\/p>\n Evolution is not scientific. Consider also the following:<\/p>\n July 30, 2019<\/p>\n Gelernter said an ideological bent has taken over the field of science. There are good scientists doing good work, \u201cbut we have a cautionary tale in what happened to our English departments and our history departments could happen to us, God forbid,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Gelernter said he likes many of his colleagues at Yale, that they are his friends, but when he looks at \u201ctheir intellectual behavior, what they have published \u2014 and much more importantly what they tell their students \u2014 Darwinism has indeed passed beyond a scientific argument as far as they are concerned. You take your life in your hands to challenge it intellectually. They will destroy you if you challenge it.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cNow, I haven\u2019t been destroyed, I am not a biologist, and I don\u2019t claim to be an authority on this topic,\u201d Gelernter added, \u201cbut what I have seen in their behavior intellectually and at colleges across the West is nothing approaching free speech on this topic. It\u2019s a bitter, fundamental, angry, outraged rejection [of intelligent design], which comes nowhere near scientific or intellectual discussion. I\u2019ve seen that happen again and again.\u201d<\/p>\n Gelernter acknowledges \u201cI am attacking their religion and I don\u2019t blame them for being all head up, it is a big issue for them.\u201d<\/p>\n How does the field of biology get over Darwin? Gelernter said the outlook is bleak.<\/p>\n \u201cReligion is imparted, more than anything else, by the parents to the children,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd young people are brought up as little Darwinists. Kids I see running around New Haven are all Darwinists. \u2026 The students in my class, they\u2019re all Darwinsts. I am not hopeful.\u201d\u00a0https:\/\/www.thecollegefix.com\/famed-yale-computer-science-professor-quits-believing-darwins-theories\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n Sadly, society has been infested with the false religion of evolution.<\/p>\n Back in February, a group of scientists signed a declaration that Darwinian evolutionary concepts are flawed:<\/p>\n Over 1,000 doctoral scientists from around the world have signed a statement publicly expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of Darwinian evolution. The statement, located online at dissentfromdarwin.org<\/i><\/a>, <\/i>reads: \u201cWe are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cBecause no scientist can show how Darwin\u2019s mechanism can produce the complexity of life, every scientist should be skeptical,\u201d said biologist Douglas Axe, director of Biologic Institute. \u201cThe fact that most won\u2019t admit to this exposes the unhealthy effect of peer pressure on scientific discourse.\u201d<\/p>\n Discovery Institute first published its Scientific Dissent from Darwinism list in in The<\/i> New York Review of Books <\/i>in 2001 to challenge false statements about Darwinian evolution made in PBS\u2019s series Evolution<\/i>. Promoters of the series, among others, claimed that \u201cvirtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true.\u201d 02\/04\/19 https:\/\/evolutionnews.org\/2019\/02\/skepticism-about-darwinian-evolution-grows-as-1000-scientists-share-their-doubts\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Evolution is seriously flawed as can also be seen from our online animation: A Lifegiver or Spontaneous Evolution?<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Notice something from our free online book Is God\u2019s Existence Logical?<\/a><\/em>:<\/p>\n Did most species slowly evolve like evolutionists have claimed for over a century?<\/p>\n No. And a study published in 2018 realizes this:<\/p>\n Mark Stoeckle from The Rockefeller University in New York and David Thaler at the University of Basel in Switzerland \u2026 published findings \u2026 sure to jostle, if not overturn, more than one settled idea about how evolution unfolds.<\/p>\n It is textbook biology, for example, that species with large, far-flung populations\u2014think ants, rats, humans\u2014will become more genetically diverse over time.<\/p>\n But is that true?<\/p>\n “The answer is no,” said Stoeckle, lead author of the study, published in the journal Human Evolution. (Hood M. Sweeping gene survey\u2026 Physic.org, May 28, 2018)<\/p>\n The study referred to above also concluded that about 90% of species, including humans, arrived at about the same time. While there are dating issues, this basically proves that the explanation of species\u2019 development as evolutionists have long claimed as fact, was false.<\/p>\n The evolutionary theories of every type, from the cosmological evolutionary epochs, abiogenesis claims, and the theory of biological evolution all try to claim they may know how all life, matter and energy developed without a creator. Something that actual laws of science show is not true.<\/p>\n The truth is that for life to randomly begin and have the immediate ability to find\/ingest\/digest food and to reproduce ignores various laws of science.<\/p>\n The other truth is that evolution is accepted by many who do not actually want to live God\u2019s way of life, nor do those \u201cbelievers\u201d tend to take seriously the prophetic warnings of the Bible. Actually the Bible is supportive of the idea that those who accept theories like evolution have allowed their minds to essentially de-evolve, in the sense that they wish to believe a lie (Romans 1:18-32).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is outrageous, but scientists who challenge many claims associated with evolution are shunned by many academic institutions, as there is a tremendous amount of pressure at most “leading” academic institutions to squelch research that is not in support of evolution as it will affect their beliefs. Thus, many in the academic world accept evolution, essentially like a false religion, since many of their friends and colleagues believe the evolutionary nonsense. Therefore, they assume that it must have been proven true. But it never has been.<\/p>\n Of course, with the mainstream media being willing accomplices, and being part of an anti-Bible agenda, evolution is treated like fact, without proof.<\/p>\n While species variation is something that God programmed in His creation, evolution, as the explanation for the origin of life, is unscientific and false. It also requires students to accept a belief that violates other known laws of biological science.<\/p>\n Actually it is impossible for the non-living to become alive as it violates the scientifically accepted law of bio-genesis<\/em> (life only comes from life). But what if we allow the possibility of spontaneous primitive life to have occurred? <\/span><\/p>\n The primitive life would have to die. Part of the reason for this is that even a single-cell is so complex, and so full of various biological subsystems, that scientists have learned that many systems are essentially necessary for life to exist or continue. Science recognizes that living organisms must be self-contained, eat, digest, and reproduce to continue to exist.<\/span><\/p>\n Spontaneously alive lined-up amino acids (with other substances coincidentally there) would die because:<\/span><\/p>\n 1) All living organisms need biological structures such as organelles and membranes. Without a membranous structure, the proteins would ultimately diffuse and destroy the living organism. Living organism must be somewhat self-contained. Proteins cannot of themselves reproduce–they need DNA. “DNA cannot exist without proteins, and proteins cannot exist without DNA” (Pietzsch J. Understanding the RNAissance. c. 2003. http:\/\/www.nature.com\/horizon\/rna\/background\/understanding.html viewed 05\/05\/12). DNA can basically do nothing of itself, it needs proteins. <\/span><\/p>\n Does any scientifically rational person actually believe that they randomly developed and got together at the same time for life as we know it to exist without Divine intervention?<\/span><\/p>\n The answer should be obvious. No, unless they will overlook the facts.<\/span><\/p>\n The Apostle Paul also wrote the following to Timothy about some who were:<\/p>\n 7<\/sup> always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. 8<\/sup> Now as Jannes and Jambres resisted Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, disapproved concerning the faith; 9<\/sup> but\u00a0they will progress no further, for their folly will be manifest to all<\/strong>, (2 Timothy 3:7-9)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is in the Bible that we are told that when God made life He intended it to reproduce (Genesis 1:11,28,29). The idea of an ‘intelligent design’ by a Spirit being is the only explanation that does not defy scientifically provable knowledge–for all other explanations result in something that must die out.<\/span><\/p>\n Even back in New Testament times, there were those who called error \u2018science,\u2019 which is what evolution as an explanation of the origin of life and the origin of the universe is. Notice:<\/p>\n 20<\/sup> O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:<\/p>\n 21<\/sup> Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. (1 Timothy 6:20-21, KJV)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So, there have been those who claimed Christ who have been misled by intellectual leaders. The Apostle John was inspired to write:<\/p>\n 26<\/sup> These things I have written to you concerning those who try to deceive you. (1 John 2:26)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Various scientists know that the facts do not support that life could have spontaneously began on planet Earth, so they keep looking for other explanations that they hope are more plausible. But have quite often come up with deceptive ones.<\/p>\n By the way, God apparently expects humans to realize that He exists through various aspects of His creation. Notice:<\/span><\/p>\n 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse (Romans 1:20).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Thus since life could not have randomly sprung forth, eaten, and reproduced, only a different type of entity (God) could have caused it to begin.<\/span><\/p>\n Evolution has led to the intentional ignorance of appropriate scientific methods. It became a religion for many in the 19th century, and remains one for many today.<\/p>\n Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n Is God\u2019s Existence Logical?<\/a> Is it really logical to believe in God? Yes! Would you like Christian answers to give atheists? This is a free online booklet that deal with improper theories and musings called science related to the origin of the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and evolution. Two animated videos of related interest are also available: Big Bang: Nothing or Creator?<\/a> and A Lifegiver or Spontaneous Evolution?<\/a> COGwriter As a scientist, I have long known that proponents of evolution treat the subject more like a religious view than a scientific theory. This is somewhat also what the Ben Stein movie Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed revealed years ago (see Ben Stein\u2019s Expelled). Evolution is not scientific. Consider also the following: Famed Yale computer […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56288","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doctrine"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n
Famed Yale computer science professor quits believing Darwin\u2019s theories<\/h2>\n
David Gelernter, a famed Yale University professor, has publicly renounced his belief in Charles Darwin\u2019s theory of evolution, calling it a \u201cbeautiful idea\u201d that has been effectively disproven. …<\/div>\n\n\n
Skepticism About Darwinian Evolution Grows as 1,000+ Scientists Share Their Doubts<\/h2>\n
False Statements About Darwinian Evolution<\/h2>\n
\n2) All living organisms need nourishment and direction. Since randomness would not have created the biological structure known as a DNA-containing nucleus (or some primitive equivalent), the cell would die. Even if it had some type of nucleus to provide direction, the nucleus would have to have come into existence with ability to determine what to eat and how to find food, another impossibility.
\n3) Proteins cannot survive without DNA and DNA cannot exist without proteins, hence there is no way both happened at the same time. <\/span>
\n4) Even if the cell had all the above, it would die, because there would have been no reason for it to have spontaneously generated a digestive system in order to utilize the food.
\n5) Even if evolutionists are granted all the improbabilities and impossibilities this article discusses, the primitive life would quickly die out as there would have been no reason for it to have spontaneously generated an ability to reproduce, nor would it have any innate ability to do so.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/b>Does it Make Physical Sense to believe in God?<\/a> Some say it is not logical to believe in God. Is that true? Here is a link to a YouTube sermon titled Is it logical to believe in God?<\/a>
\nIs Evolution Probable or Impossible or Is God’s Existence Logical? Part II<\/a> This short article clearly answers what ‘pseudo-scientists’ refuse to acknowledge. Here is a link to a YouTube video titled Is There Another View of Evolution?<\/a> and another titled Quickly Disprove Evolution as the Origin of Life<\/a>.
\nHow Old is the Earth and How Long Were the Days of Creation?<\/a> Does the Bible allow for the creation of the universe and earth billions of years ago? Why do some believe they are no older than 6,000 years old? What is the gap theory? Were the days of creation in Genesis 1:3 through 2:3 24 hours long? Here is a link to a sermon: <\/span>Genesis, ‘Prehistoric man,’ and the Gap theory<\/a>. Here is a link to a related article in Spanish: \u00bfCu\u00e1n vieja es la Tierra? \u00bfCu\u00e1n largos fueron los D\u00edas de la Creaci\u00f3n? \u00bfTeor\u00eda de la brecha?<\/a><\/span>
\nHow is God Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient?<\/a> Here is a biblical article which answers what many really wonder about it.
\nProof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a> This free book has over 200 Hebrew prophecies were fulfilled by Jesus. Plus, His arrival was consistent with specific prophecies and even Jewish interpretations of prophecy. Here are links to seven related sermons: Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a>, Prophecies of Jesus\u2019 birth, timing, and death<\/a>, Jesus\u2019 prophesied divinity<\/a>, 200+ OT prophecies Jesus filled; Plus prophecies He made<\/a>, Why Don\u2019t Jews Accept Jesus?<\/a>, Daniel 9, Jews, and Jesus<\/a>, and Facts and Atheists’ Delusions About Jesus<\/a>. Plus the links to two sermonettes: Luke\u2019s census: Any historical evidence?<\/a> and Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah, but<\/a> … These videos cover nearly all of the book, plus have some information not in the book.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"