{"id":62586,"date":"2020-06-01T16:10:40","date_gmt":"2020-06-02T00:10:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=62586"},"modified":"2020-06-02T04:44:39","modified_gmt":"2020-06-02T12:44:39","slug":"5g-is-expanding-but-with-health-and-other-concerns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/prophecy\/5g-is-expanding-but-with-health-and-other-concerns\/","title":{"rendered":"5g is expanding, but with health and other concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\n5G logo (Wikipedia)
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

The technology known as 5G is expanding as the following report related to T-Mobile shows:<\/p>\n

June 1, 2020<\/p>\n

BELLEVUE, Wash. & ANCHORAGE, Alaska–(BUSINESS WIRE<\/a>)–The country\u2019s one and only<\/i><\/b> nationwide 5G network just got nationwide-r, expanding its footprint with partner coverage! T-Mobile (NASDAQ: TMUS) and GCI today announced a historic partnership, immediately allowing T-Mobile customers with 5G smartphones to tap into 5G while roaming in Anchorage, Alaska, making T-Mobile the first and only wireless provider to offer 5G coverage in all 50 states! The new partnership also gives GCI customers roaming access to T-Mobile\u2019s nationwide 5G network, America\u2019s largest, covering more than one million square miles and nearly 6,000 cities and towns. https:\/\/www.businesswire.com\/news\/home\/20200601005469\/en\/T-Mobile-5G-50-States%21<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But there are concerns:<\/p>\n

June 1, 2020<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The next generation of high-speed mobile data, known as 5G<\/a>, is live in many countries including the US, the UK<\/a> and Australia<\/a>.\u00a0…<\/p>\n

One of the biggest concerns people have about 5G is that the network’s radio frequency will be unsafe, expose people to radiation and cause cancer. The fears aren’t completely unfounded — a 2011 report from the World Health Organization<\/a> suggested that cellphone radiation should be listed as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”\u00a0 In 2016, a study funded by the US government showed a link between radio frequency radiation and cancers<\/a> in rats. And popular phones like the iPhone and Galaxy handsets may exceed the level of radio frequency radiation<\/a> allowed by the FCC. …<\/p>\n

Though it’s too early to be 100% confident, we do know that on Aug. 8, after more than six years of research and review, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai circulated a proposal to deem cellphones, including ones that use 5G, as safe<\/a>. https:\/\/www.expressnews.com\/cnet\/article\/5G-myths-debunked-No-5G-doesn-t-cause-COVID-19-15307664.php<\/a><\/p>\n

People often say 5G hasn\u2019t been tested, and to some extent that is true. But given 5G uses millimetre wave technology and that technology has been studied for quite some time, it has obviously been tested by those who have worked on them. So why hasn\u2019t this information been widely released? Why are we not looking at the available data on millimetre wave technology as it relates to 5G?<\/p>\n

Recently we came across 7 Russian studies that were summarized in a report<\/a> declassified through the CIA. These studies were declassified in 2012 and marked \u201cFor Goverment Use Only.\u201d From what you can gather very quickly in this report, the conclusions should shut down 5G rollout instantly. At least until someone can show, beyond any reasonable doubt, that this technology is safe.<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s have a quick look at how this report was concluded:<\/p>\n

\u201cThus the conducted investigations indicate high biological activity and an unfavourable influence of millimeter radiowaves on the organism. The expression of the biological reactions increased with an increase of the period of\u00a0iridation and depended on individual characteristics of the organism.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

What this translates to in plain English is, millimetre-wave frequencies do affect the human body negatively, and the longer the exposure, the more damage that occurs. Since 5G uses millimetre waves and is set to push a constant barrage of frequency on humans anywhere they go, this would mean sustained wave exposure, and thus inevitable biological damage. https:\/\/www.collective-evolution.com\/2020\/05\/30\/dr-buttar-reveals-declassified-government-report-related-to-5g-dangers\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Notice also something last Fall from Scientific American<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\n

We Have No Reason to Believe 5G Is Safe<\/h2>\n

The telecommunications industry and their experts have accused many scientists who have researched the effects of cell phone radiation of “fear mongering” over the advent of wireless technology’s 5G. Since much of our research is publicly-funded, we believe it is our ethical responsibility to inform the public about what the peer-reviewed scientific literature tells us about the health risks from wireless radiation. … more than 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (EMF) signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal<\/a>, which calls for stronger exposure limits. The appeal makes the following assertions:<\/p>\n

\u201cNumerous recent scientific publications have shown that EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life.\u201d<\/p>\n

The scientists who signed this appeal arguably constitute the majority of experts on the effects of nonionizing radiation. They have published more than 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals. …<\/p>\n

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” <\/a>in 2011. Last year, a $30 million study conducted by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) found \u201cclear evidence\u201d that two years of exposure to cell phone RFR increased cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats <\/a>and mice <\/a>of both sexes. …<\/p>\n

As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play? 10\/17\/19 https:\/\/blogs.scientificamerican.com\/observations\/we-have-no-reason-to-believe-5g-is-safe\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Notice also the following:<\/p>\n

\n

The 5G danger can\u2019t be overstated. <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

5G (5th Generation) is now being actively rolled out in many cities around the world. Simultaneously, as awareness over its horrific health and privacy impacts is rising, many places are issuing moratoriums on it or banning it, such as the entire nation of Belgium, the city of Vaud (Switzerland) and San Francisco (USA). Radiofrequency radiation (RF or RFR) and electromagnetic fields (EMF) are being increasingly recognized as new types of pollution \u2013 environmental pollution.<\/em> 11\/16\/19 https:\/\/www.globalresearch.ca\/5g-danger-13-reasons-5g-wireless-technology-will-be-a-catastrophe-for-humanity\/5680503<\/a><\/p>\n

20,000 Satellites for 5G to be Launched Sending Focused Beams of Intense Microwave Radiation Over Entire Earth<\/strong><\/p>\n

If you weren\u2019t already familiar with 5G \u2013 research has already proven that exposure is harmful to people<\/a>, animals<\/a>, and nature<\/a>. Reports of illness from exposure to 5G have already been reported and a 5G court case was already won<\/a> in England. …<\/p>\n

In the U.S.<\/a> and elsewhere<\/a>, outdated legislation<\/a> and guidelines protect all sources of wireless radiation \u2013 not the public<\/a> or the environment<\/a>. This includes 5G. So just because all these wireless sources are legal<\/a> doesn\u2019t mean they are safe<\/a>. Fat substitute olestra<\/a> is legal too \u2013 that doesn\u2019t mean you\u2019d risk intestinal mayhem and eat anything made with it. 01\/08\/19 https:\/\/www.activistpost.com\/2019\/01\/details-about-the-20000-satellites-earmarked-for-beaming-5g-radiation-at-us-from-space-and-why-this-is-a-bad-idea.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Environmental effects of existing RF radiation have also been ignored. 5G will massively increase the microwave and millimeter wave radiation in our environment, and will have a detrimental effect on wildlife and trees. 5G will substantially increase exposure to radio\u2013<\/em>frequency electromagnetic fields RF-EMF, that has already been proven to be harmful for humans, animals and the environment.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Risks from 5G include:<\/strong><\/p>\n