{"id":71412,"date":"2021-10-08T07:00:28","date_gmt":"2021-10-08T15:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=71412"},"modified":"2021-10-10T06:25:43","modified_gmt":"2021-10-10T14:25:43","slug":"ncr-pope-francis-to-declare-st-irenaeus-a-doctor-of-the-church-with-title-doctor-of-unity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/church-history\/ncr-pope-francis-to-declare-st-irenaeus-a-doctor-of-the-church-with-title-doctor-of-unity\/","title":{"rendered":"NCR: Pope Francis to Declare St. Irenaeus a Doctor of the Church with Title \u2018Doctor of Unity\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nAn engraving allegedly of Irenaeus, in Gaul (now Lyons, France)<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

The National Catholic Register<\/em> (NCR) reported that Pope Francis announced he intends to declare Irenaeus of Lyon<\/a>. a “Doctor of the Church”:<\/p>\n

\n

Pope Francis to Declare St. Irenaeus a Doctor of the Church with Title \u2018Doctor of Unity\u2019<\/h2>\n

October 7, 2021<\/p>\n

Pope Francis said on Thursday that he plans to declare St. Irenaeus of Lyon a Doctor of the Church with the title \u201cDoctor unitatis,\u201d meaning \u201cDoctor of Unity.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Pope made the announcement in a speech<\/a> to the St. Irenaeus Working Group, a group of Catholic and Orthodox theologians who conducted a study together on synodality and primacy.<\/p>\n

\u201cYour patron, St. Irenaeus of Lyon \u2014 whom soon I will willingly declare a Doctor of the Church with the title Doctor unitatis \u2014 came from the East, exercised his episcopal ministry in the West, and was a great spiritual and theological \u00a0bridge between Eastern and Western Christians,\u201d Pope Francis said on Oct. 7.<\/p>\n

St. Irenaeus<\/a> was a second-century bishop and writer revered by both Catholics and Orthodox Christians …<\/p>\n

Pope Francis expressed hope that the Catholic Church\u2019s upcoming synod on synodality will allow Catholics around the world to reflect on synodality and Petrine primacy.<\/p>\n

The Pope will kick off the Church\u2019s three-year synodal process this weekend with a Mass on Oct. 10. All dioceses have also been invited to offer an opening Mass the following Sunday on Oct. 17.<\/p>\n

\u201cI am confident that, with the help of God, the synodal process that will begin in the coming days in every Catholic diocese will also be an opportunity for deeper reflection on this important aspect, together with other Christians,\u201d Pope Francis said.<\/p>\n

Pope Francis noted that the group of Orthodox and Catholic scholars had chosen St. Irenaeus as their patron.<\/p>\n

Cardinal Kurt Koch, the president of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity, also participated in the papal audience with the St. Irenaeus working group.<\/p>\n

The cardinal has argued<\/a> that strengthening synodality is \u201cthe most important contribution\u201d that the Catholic Church can make to ecumenical dialogue, especially dialogue with the Orthodox. https:\/\/www.ncregister.com\/cna\/pope-francis-to-declare-st-irenaeus-a-doctor-of-the-church-with-title-doctor-of-unity<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is interesting for two reasons.<\/p>\n

The first is that this in another step by the Vatican to push more ecumenical unity. It is not only the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches that revere Irenaeus, many Protestants do. Actually, Baptist minister G.H. Orchard<\/span> also<\/span> claimed<\/span> Irenaeus of Lyon was a<\/span> \u201c<\/span>primitive <\/span>Baptist.” Furthermore, Church of England’s <\/span>Angelo Benton published a “succession list” for his church that included Irenaeus (further information can be found in the free online book: Hope of Salvation: How the Continuing<\/em> Church of God Differs from Protestantism<\/a>). Thus, Francis’ announcement may be favorably received by some Protestants.<\/span><\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But the second reason that this is interesting is that Irenaeus, despite being a heretic as far as the CCOG is concerned, he did hold some key doctrinal positions that the Roman and Orthodox Catholics do not.<\/p>\n

For example, Irenaeus taught the millennium and the 6000\/7000 year plan as he wrote:<\/p>\n

\n

Thus, then, the six hundred years of Noah, in whose time the deluge occurred because of the apostasy, and the number of the cubits of the image for which these just men were sent into the fiery furnace, do indicate the number of the name of that man in whom is concentrated the whole apostasy of six thousand years, and unrighteousness, and wickedness, and false prophecy, and deception (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 29, Verse 2. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2004 by K. Knight).<\/span><\/p>\n

Inasmuch, therefore, as the opinions of certain [orthodox persons] are derived from heretical discourses, they are both ignorant of God’s dispensations , and of the mystery of the resurrection of the just , and of the [ earthly ] kingdom which is the commencement of incorruption, by means of which kingdom those who shall be worthy are accustomed gradually to partake of the divine nature (capere Deum <\/em> ); and it is necessary to tell them respecting those things, that it behoves the righteous first to receive the promise of the inheritance which God promised to the fathers, and to reign in it, when they rise again to behold God in this creation which is renovated , and that the judgment should take place afterwards (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 32, Verse 1. <\/span>Translated by Alexander Roberts and William Rambaut.<\/span> From Ante-Nicene Fathers<\/span>, Vol. 1.<\/span><\/span> Edited by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe.<\/span> (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co.,<\/span><\/span> 1885.<\/span>) Revised and edited for New Advent by Kevin Knight.<\/span><\/span> <http:\/\/www.newadvent.org\/fathers\/0103532.htm>.<\/span>).<\/span><\/p>\n

And again He says, “Whosoever shall have left lands, or houses, or parents, or brethren, or children because of Me, he shall receive in this world an hundred-fold, and in that to come he shall inherit eternal life.” For what are the hundred-fold [rewards] in this word, the entertainments given to the poor, and the suppers for which a return is made? These are [to take place] in the times of the kingdom, that is, upon the seventh day, which has been sanctified, in which God rested from all the works which He created, which is the true Sabbath of the righteous, which they shall not be engaged in any earthly occupation; but shall have a table at hand prepared for them by God, supplying them with all sorts of dishes (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 33, Verse 2. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2004 by K. Knight).<\/span><\/p>\n

That the whole creation shall, according to God’s will, obtain a vast increase, that it may bring forth and sustain fruits such [as we have mentioned], Isaiah declares: “And there shall be upon every high mountain, and upon every prominent hill, water running everywhere in that day, when many shall perish, when walls shall fall. And the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun, seven times that of the day, when He shall heal the anguish of His people, and do away with the pain of His stroke.” Now “the pain of the stroke” means that inflicted at the beginning upon disobedient man in Adam, that is, death; which [stroke] the Lord will heal when He raises us from the dead, and restores the inheritance of the fathers, as Isaiah again says: “And thou shall be confident in the LORD, and He will cause thee to pass over the whole earth, and feed thee with the inheritance of Jacob thy father.” This is what the Lord declared: “Happy are those servants whom the Lord when He cometh shall find watching. Verily I say unto you, that He shall gird Himself, and make them to sit down [to meat], and will come forth and serve them. And if He shall come in the evening watch, and find them so, blessed are they, because He shall make them sit down, and minister to them; or if this be in the second, or it be in the third, blessed are they.” Again John also says the very same in the Apocalypse: “Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection.” Then, too, Isaiah has declared the time when these events shall occur; he says: “And I said, Lord, how long? Until the cities be wasted without inhabitant, and the houses be without men, and the earth be left a desert. And after these things the LORD shall remove us men far away (longe nos faciet Deus homines), and those who shall remain shall multiply upon the earth.” Then Daniel also says this very thing: “And the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of those under the heaven, is given to the saints of the Most High God, whose kingdom is everlasting, and all dominions shall serve and obey Him.” And lest the promise named should be understood as referring to this time, it was declared to the prophet: “And come thou, and stand in thy lot at the consummation of the days.” Now, that the promises were not announced to the prophets and the fathers alone, but to the Churches united to these from the nations (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 34, Verses 2-3. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2004 by K. Knight).<\/span><\/p>\n

If, however, any shall endeavour to allegorize [prophecies] of this kind, they shall not be found consistent with themselves in all points, and shall be confuted by the teaching of the very expressions [in question]. For example: When the cities of the Gentiles shall be desolate, so that they be not inhabited, and the houses so that there shall be no men in them and the land shall be left desolate. For, behold, says Isaiah, the day of the Lord comes past remedy, full of fury and wrath, to lay waste the city of the earth, and to root sinners out of it. And again he says, Let him be taken away, that he behold not the glory of God.And when these things are done, he says, God will remove men far away, and those that are left shall multiply in the earth. And they shall build houses, and shall inhabit them themselves: and plant vineyards, and eat of them themselves. For all these and other words were unquestionably spoken in reference to the resurrection of the just, which takes place after the coming of Antichrist, and the destruction of all nations under his rule; in [the times of] which [resurrection] the righteous shall reign in the earth, waxing stronger by the sight of the Lord: and through Him they shall become accustomed to partake in the glory of God the Father, and shall enjoy in the kingdom intercourse and communion with the holy angels, and union with spiritual beings; and [with respect to] those whom the Lord shall find in the flesh, awaiting Him from heaven, and who have suffered tribulation, as well as escaped the hands of the Wicked one (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 35, Verse 1. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2004 by K. Knight).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Thus Irenaeus clearly taught that after 6,000 years of human reign that there was to be a physical kingdom of God on the earth and that resurrected saints would reign in that kingdom. He also objected to those that allegorize it away, which is officially what the Greco-Roman faiths teach.<\/p>\n

Irenaeus also taught:<\/p>\n

\n

But when this Antichrist shall have devastated all things in this world, he will reign for three years and six months, … and then the Lord will come from heaven in the clouds, in the glory of the Father, sending this man and those who follow him into the lake of fire; but bringing in for the righteous the times of the kingdom, that is, the rest, the hallowed seventh day; and restoring to Abraham the promised inheritance, in which kingdom the Lord declared, that “many coming from the east and from the west should sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.” (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book V, Chapter 30:4<\/span>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Here Irenaeus is teaching that the seventh one thousand years begins after the final Antichrist has reigned for 3 1\/2 years. That is a millennial teaching.<\/p>\n

Yet, officially the Roman and Eastern Orthodox churches do not teach that.<\/p>\n

The Church of Rome now strongly condemns<\/strong><\/em> this belief. Notice:<\/p>\n

\n

676<\/strong> The Antichrist’s deception already begins to take shape in the world every time the claim is made to realize within history that messianic hope which can only be realized beyond history through the eschatological judgment. The Church has rejected even modified forms of this falsification of the kingdom to come under the name of millenarianism, especially the “intrinsically perverse” political form of a secular messianism. (Catechism of the Catholic Church. Imprimatur Potest +Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. Doubleday, NY 1995, p. 194).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

It should be noted that the millennial teaching appears to be the only doctrine associated with Antichrist that is condemned in the current official Catechism of the Catholic Church<\/em> (which is the first new one in hundreds of years). The one that has the imprimatur of Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger who is now called Pope Emeritus and was Pope Benedict XVI.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, notice that Pope Benedict XVI called him:<\/p>\n

The true founder of Catholic theology, St. Irenaeus of Lyon (Pope Benedict XVI. Homily for the Solemnity of Sts. Peter and Paul. June 29, 2005, http:\/\/www.crossroadsinitiative.com\/library_article\/647\/Homily_on_Saints_Peter_and_Paul_Pope_Benedict_XVI.html 6\/19\/07).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Those in the Church of God do not consider that Irenaeus was the founder of true theology. Yet, Benedict praised one who promoted the ONLY doctrine his Catechism associated with the Antichrist!<\/p>\n

Furthermore, Irenaeus was NOT a trinitarian, but a binitarian. Irenaeus wrote:<\/p>\n

…there is none other called God by the Scriptures except the Father of all, and the Son, and those who possess the adoption (Irenaeus. Adversus haereses, Book IV, Preface, Verse 4. Excerpted from Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume 1. Edited by Alexander Roberts & James Donaldson. American Edition, 1885. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2004 by K. Knight).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Notice that he does not say that the Holy Spirit is also called God. Also notice that Irenaeus states that only the Father, the Son, and those who possess the adoption (Christians) are God. This is a “binitarian”, not a trinitarian view.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, Irenaeus claimed to have met the faithful Polycarp of Smyrna<\/a>. Notice some of what Irenaeus records about Polycarp:<\/p>\n

But Polycarp also was not only instructed by apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also, by apostles in Asia, appointed bishop of the Church in Smyrna\u2026always taught the things which he had learned from the apostles, and which the Church has handed down, and which alone are true. To these things all the Asiatic Churches testify, as do also those men who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time (Irenaeus. Adversus Haeres. Book III, Chapter 4, Verse 3 and Chapter 3, Verse 4).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So we have from this early Roman Catholic source that Polycarp and his successors in Asia Minor (at least until the time that Irenaeus wrote this, around 180 A.D.) practiced the true teachings that they learned from the apostles.<\/p>\n

Polycarp was a Sabbath keeper, kept the biblical Holy Days, observed Passover on the 14th of Nisan\/Abib, and held other doctrines that the Roman and Orthodox Catholics oppose.<\/p>\n

This and more is documented in the free online book: Beliefs of the Original Catholic Church<\/a>.<\/p>\n

So, then, how can the Vatican get away with the obvious problems of designating one who was opposed to many of its current teachings as a “Doctor of unity”?<\/p>\n

This is because few people truly understand the truth about early Christian church history.<\/p>\n

If so, NONE who would accept the truth would be Protestant, Eastern Orthodox, or Roman Catholic.<\/p>\n

The original Christian church held Church of God doctrines–and even Irenaeus held to some of them.<\/p>\n

Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n

Irenaeus: The Most Dangerous Heretic?<\/a> Was Irenaeus a faithful peacemaker or was he possibly the most dangerous of the early heretics?
\nPolycarp of Smyrna: The Heretic Fighter<\/a> Polycarp was the successor of the Apostle John and a major leader in Asia Minor. Do you know much about what he taught? A YouTube video or related interesy may be: Polycarp of Smyrna: Why Christians should know more about him<\/a>.
\nContinuing History of the Church of God<\/a> This pdf booklet is a historical overview of the true Church of God and some of its main opponents from Acts 2 to the 21st century. Related sermon links include Continuing History of the Church of God: c. 31 to c. 300 A.D<\/a>. and Continuing History of the Church of God: 4th-16th Centuries<\/a> and Continuing History of the Church of God: 17th-20th Centuries<\/a>. The booklet is available in Spanish: Continuaci\u00f3n de la Historia de la Iglesia de Dios<\/a>, German: Kontinuierliche Geschichte der Kirche Gottes<\/a>, French: L \u0019Histoire Continue<\/em> de l \u0019\u00c9glise de Dieu<\/a> and Ekegusii Omogano Bw\u2019ekanisa Ya Nyasae Egendererete<\/a>.
\nWhy Should American Catholics Fear Unity with the Orthodox? (And the Protestants) <\/a><\/span> Are the current ecumenical meetings a good thing or will they result in disaster? Is doctrinal compromise good? Here is a link to a related video Should you be concerned about the ecumenical movement? <\/span><\/a>
\nDid The Early Church Teach Millenarianism?<\/a> Was the millennium (sometimes called chiliasm) taught by early Christians? Who condemned it? Will Jesus literally reign for 1000 years on the earth? Is this time near? Two related sermons are available Millennial Utopia<\/a> and The Millennium<\/a>.<\/a>
\n<\/b>Does God Have a 6,000 Year Plan? What Year Does the 6,000 Years End?<\/a> Was a 6000 year time allowed for humans to rule followed by a literal thousand year reign of Christ on Earth taught by the early Christians? Does God have 7,000 year plan? What year may the six thousand years of human rule end? When will Jesus return? 2029 or or 2031 or 20xx? There is also a video titled 6000 Years: When will God’s Kingdom Come?<\/a> Here is a link to the article in Spanish: \u00bfTiene Dios un plan de 6,000 a\u00f1os?<\/a>
\nBinitarian View: One God, Two Beings Before the Beginning<\/a> Is binitarianism the correct position? What about unitarianism or trinitarianism?
\nIs The Father God?<\/a> What is the view of the Bible? What was the view of the early church?
\nProof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a> This free book has over 200 Hebrew prophecies were fulfilled by Jesus. Plus, His arrival was consistent with specific prophecies and even Jewish interpretations of prophecy. Here are links to seven related sermons: Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a>, Prophecies of Jesus\u2019 birth, timing, and death<\/a>, Jesus\u2019 prophesied divinity<\/a>, 200+ OT prophecies Jesus filled; Plus prophecies He made<\/a>, Why Don\u2019t Jews Accept Jesus?<\/a>, Daniel 9, Jews, and Jesus<\/a>, and Facts and Atheists’ Delusions About Jesus<\/a>. Plus the links to two sermonettes: Luke\u2019s census: Any historical evidence?<\/a> and Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah, but<\/a> … These videos cover nearly all of the book, plus have some information not in the book. We also have the book translated in the Spanish PRUEBA de que JES\u00daS es el MES\u00cdAS<\/a> and French PREUVES QUE J\u00c9SUS EST LE MESSIE<\/a> languages.
\nDid Early Christians Think the Holy Spirit Was A Separate Person in a Trinity?<\/a> Or did they have a different view? A related sermon is available: Truth about the Holy Spirit: What THEY do not want you to know!<\/a><\/em><\/a><\/span>
\nDid the True Church Ever Teach a Trinity?<\/a> Most act like this is so, but is it? Here is an old, by somewhat related, article in the Spanish language LA DOCTRINA DE LA TRINIDAD<\/a>. Two related sermons are available: Trinity: Fundamental to Christianity or Something Else?<\/a> and The Godhead and the Trinity<\/a>. A brief video is also available: Three trinitarian scriptures?<\/a>
\nWas Unitarianism the Teaching of the Bible or Early Church?<\/a> Many, including Jehovah’s Witnesses<\/a>, claim it was, but was it? Here is a link to a related sermon: Unitarianism? How is God One?<\/a>
\nBeliefs of the Original Catholic Church<\/a>. Did the original \u201ccatholic church\u201d have doctrines held by the Continuing Church of God? Did Church of God leaders uses the term \u201ccatholic church\u201d to ever describe the church they were part of? Here are links to related sermons: Original Catholic Church of God?<\/a> , Original Catholic Doctrine: Creed, Liturgy, Baptism, Passover<\/a>, and What Type of Catholic was Polycarp of Smyrna?<\/a>, Tradition, Holy Days, Salvation, Dress, & Celibacy<\/a>, and Early Heresies and Heretics<\/a>, and Doctrines: 3 Days, Abortion, Ecumenism, Meats<\/a>, Tithes, Crosses, Destiny, and more<\/a>, and Saturday or Sunday?<\/a>, and The Godhead<\/a>.Hope of Salvation: How the Continuing<\/em> Church of God Differs from Protestantism<\/a> The CCOG is NOT Protestant. This free online book explains how the real <\/em>Church of God differs from mainstream\/traditional Protestants. Several sermons related to the free book are also available: Protestant, Baptist, and CCOG History<\/a>; The First Protestant, God\u2019s Command, Grace, & Character<\/a>; The New Testament, Martin Luther, and the Canon<\/a>; Eucharist, Passover, and Easter<\/a>; Views of Jews, Lost Tribes, Warfare, & Baptism<\/a>; Scripture vs. Tradition, Sabbath vs. Sunday<\/a>; Church Services, Sunday, Heaven, and God\u2019s Plan<\/a>; Seventh Day Baptists\/Adventists\/Messianics: Protestant or COG?<\/a>; Millennial Kingdom of God and God\u2019s Plan of Salvation<\/a>; Crosses, Trees, Tithes, and Unclean Meats<\/a>; The Godhead and the Trinity<\/a>; Fleeing or Rapture?<\/a>; and Ecumenism, Rome, and CCOG Differences<\/a>.
\n<\/strong>The History of Early Christianity<\/a> Are you aware that what most people believe is not what truly happened to the true Christian church? Do you know where the early church was based? Do you know what were the doctrines of the early church? Is your faith really based upon the truth or compromise?<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An engraving allegedly of Irenaeus, in Gaul (now Lyons, France) COGwriter The National Catholic Register (NCR) reported that Pope Francis announced he intends to declare Irenaeus of Lyon. a “Doctor of the Church”: Pope Francis to Declare St. Irenaeus a Doctor of the Church with Title \u2018Doctor of Unity\u2019 October 7, 2021 Pope Francis said […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-71412","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church-history"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t