![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/GraceCommunion.png\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n In its latest public letter, Greg Williams, president of Grace Communion International (the current name of the Protestant group that took over and changed the old Worldwide Church of God) had the following:<\/p>\n July 20, 2022<\/p>\n During Easter season, we studied John 17\u00a0and explored the prayer of Jesus that he prayed for the disciples and us. How amazing for Jesus to include all believers in his prayer, and even more amazing to include us in his life and love. The essence of the prayer is, \u201cthat all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you<\/em>.\u201d (John 17:21<\/a>) …<\/p>\n Paul … says this, \u201cMake every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace<\/em>\u201d (Ephesians 4:3, NIV<\/a>).<\/p>\n The oneness, the unity that Jesus prayed for us is produced through the presence and power of the Spirit. It is a gift for us to receive, and then for us to pass along. https:\/\/update.gci.org\/2022\/07\/unity\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n GCI has a false, and unbiblical vision of Christian unity.<\/p>\n By discussing Easter in this context, Greg Williams reminded me that the one of the reasons the world celebrates “Easter”–which was supposed to be Passover–on a Sunday as a “Christian” holiday is because the sun-worshiping Emperor Constantine wanted his version of “unity” above the Bible.<\/p>\n Passover was always kept on the 14th of Nisan by those who claimed to be faithful to the practices of the Apostle John and the Bible.<\/p>\n But, since many compromised and wanted to keep it on a Sunday, there were two different dates the professing world was keeping Passover in the fourth century.<\/p>\n Emperor Constantine did not like that at all and convened the famous Council of Nicea in 325 A.D. to decide on a universal date:<\/p>\n \u2026the emperor\u2026convened a council of 318 bishops\u2026in the city of Nicea\u2026They passed certain ecclesiastical canons at the council besides, and at the same time decreed in regard to the Passover that there must be one unanimous concord on the celebration of God\u2019s holy and supremely excellent day. For it was variously observed by people\u2026 (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide). Section VI, Verses 1,1 and 1,3. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp.471-472). A Sunday date was selected, instead of Nisan 14 (which can fall on any day of the week).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Notice what Constantine declared about this:<\/p>\n The commemoration of the most sacred paschal feast being then debated, it was unanimously decided, that it would be well that it should be everywhere celebrated upon the same day. What can be more fair, or more seemly, than that that festival by which we have received the hope of immortality should be carefully celebrated by all, on plain grounds, with the same order and exactitude? It was, in the first place, declared improper to follow the custom of the Jews in the celebration of this holy festival, because, their hands having been stained with crime, the minds of these wretched men are necessarily blinded. By rejecting their custom, we establish and hand down to succeeding ages one which is more reasonable, and which has been observed ever since the day of our Lord\u2019s sufferings. Let us, then, have nothing in common with the Jews, who are our adversaries. For we have received from our Saviour another way\u2026 (Theodoret of Cyrus. Ecclesiastical History (Book I), Chapter IX. Excerpted from Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Second Series, Volume 3. Edited by Philip Schaff and Henry Wace. American Edition, 1892. Online Edition Copyright \u00a9 2005 by K. Knight).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Actually, the Saviour observed Passover on the 14th of Nisan. It is those who reject the ways of our Saviour who accept the decision of the Roman Emperor over the Bible who do not observe it then. Notice that the first consideration was to not follow the Jews\u2013and they were the ones who followed the Bible. Second, he claimed that people always accepted his Sunday date, but there is absolutely no evidence of this\u2013Sunday Passover was something that second century Romans implemented\u2013there is no proof whatsoever that any observed it on Sunday prior to that, thus Constantine\u2019s second reason is also in error.<\/p>\n According to Eusebius\u2019 Life of Constantine<\/em>, Book III chapter 18, a more accurate translation of that last line above from the Roman Emperor Constantine should be:<\/p>\n Let us then have nothing in common with the detestable Jewish crowd; for we have received from our Saviour a different way.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I do not recall Jesus indicating that Jews were detestable (He was a Jew) nor that He ever changed the date of Passover. But apparently Constantine felt otherwise. And the Sunday observance is now known as Easter (a related article of interest may be Did Early Christians Celebrate Easter?<\/a>). Instead of biblical unity, ‘Constantinian’ unity is what GCI and others seem to want.<\/p>\n The Catechism of the Catholic Church<\/em> teaches:<\/p>\n 1170<\/strong> At the Council of Nicea in 325, all the Churches agreed that Easter, the Christian Passover, should be celebrated on the Sunday following the first full moon (14 Nisan) after the vernal equinox (Catechism of the Catholic Church. Imprimatur Potest +Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger. Doubleday, NY 1995, p. 332).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n But the idea that \u201call the Churches agreed\u201d is not true as the bishops from the faithful churches did not attend that Council.<\/p>\n Notice what the Roman Catholic priest and historian Bellarmino Bagatti wrote:<\/p>\n \u2026the inhabitants of Syria, of Cilcia and of Mesopotamia were still celebrating Easter {Passover} with the Jews\u2026<\/p>\n The importance of the matters to be discussed and the great division that existed had led Constantine to bring together a big number of bishops, including confessors of the faith, in order to give the impression that the whole of Christendom was represented.<\/p>\n In fact\u2026the churches of Jewish stock had had no representation\u2026From this we can conclude that no Judaeo-Christian bishop participated in the Council. Either they were not invited or they declined to attend<\/strong>. And so the capitulars had a free hand to establish norms for certain practices without meeting opposition or hearing other view points. Once the road was open future Councils would continue on these lines, thus deepening the breach between the Christians of two-stocks. The point of view of the Judaeo-Christians, devoid of Greek philosophical formation, was that of keeping steadfast to the Testimonia<\/em>, and therefore not to admit any word foreign to the Bible, including Homoousion<\/em> (Bagatti, Bellarmino. Translated by Eugene Hoade. The Church from the Gentiles in Palestine. Nihil obstat: Ignatius Mancini, 1 Februari 1970. Imprimi potest: Herminius Roncari, 26 Februari 1970. Imprimatur: +Albertus Gori, die 28 Februarii 1970. Franciscan Printing Press, Jerusalem, 1971, pp. 47-48).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So not every church was represented. Nor did everyone accept the decree of the sun-worshipping emperor as the Roman Catholic-supporting Epiphanius noted a few decades after that Council:<\/p>\n The Quartodecimans contentiously keep Passover on one day, once per year\u2026They keep the Passover on whichever day the fourteenth of the month falls\u2026Christ had to be slain on the fourteenth of the month in accordance with the law (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide<\/em>). Section IV, Verses 1,3;1,6;2,6. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp. 23-25).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The Quartodecimans only kept Passover once per year\u2013not daily like most Roman Catholic priests do\u2013not weekly or monthly like some Catholics\/Protestants do. It is of interest to note that Epiphanius recognized that Jesus HAD to be slain on the 14th of the month. It is sad that he and others did not believe they needed to observe it when and how Jesus taught. Strangely he wrote this about the practices of the Greco-Roman church (which we now call Roman and Orthodox Catholics, but he calls \u201cGod\u2019s holy church\u201d):<\/p>\n But God\u2019s holy church does not miss the truth in any way in her fixing the date of this mystery. She uses not only the fourteenth day, but also the seven days which recur order of the seven days of the week\u2026And she uses not only the fourteenth day of the lunar month, but the course of the sun as well, to keep us from observing two Passovers in one year and not even one in another. We observe the fourteenth day, then, but we wait until after the equinox and bring the end of our full observance to the sacred Lord\u2019s day (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide<\/em>). Section IV, Verses 3,1; 3,2; 3,3-4. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp. 25).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Well, the Greco-Roman Catholics and Protestants most certainly do not observe Passover on the evening of the 14th unless that happens to fall when some observe an evening mass\u2013the equinox argument is not scriptural. And since the \u201cLord\u2019s Supper\u201d is observed frequently, most practicing Greco-Roman Catholics and Protestants do observe it more than once per year.<\/p>\n The fourth\/fifth century historian Epiphanius even admits that the church used to observe the 14th when he wrote:<\/p>\n Audians\u2026they choose to celebrate the Passover with the Jews\u2013that is they contentiously celebrate the Passover at the same time as the Jews are holding their Festival of Unleavened Bread. And indeed that this used to be the church\u2019s custom<\/strong> (Epiphanius. The Panarion of Epiphanius of Salamis, Books II and III (Sects 47-80), De Fide<\/em>). Section VI, Verses 8,11; 9,2. Translated by Frank Williams. EJ Brill, New York, 1994, pp. 410-411).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Anyway, since Constantine\u2019s declarations did not stop everyone from properly observing Passover, a later Roman Emperor after he became a baptized \u201cChristian\u201d, decreed the death penalty:<\/p>\n Edicts of Theodosius against the heretics, A.D. 380-394\u2026Theodosius\u2026decreed that\u2026by the death of the offender; and the same capital punishment was inflicted on the Audians, or Quartodecimans, who should dare to perpetrate the atrocious crime of celebrating on an improper day the festival (Gibbon E. Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Volume III, Chapter XXVII. ca. 1776-1788).<\/p>\n The various enactments against heretics are contained in the Code of Theodosius (16. tit. 5. s. 6<\/em>\u201423 ; and the commentary of Gothofredus): the Eunomians, whose guilt consisted in denying any resemblance between the two sub- tances, and who were accordingly Anomoeans, were also deprived of the power of testamentary disposition, and of taking by testamentary gift: they seem, in fact, to have been deprived of all the rights of citizens. The Manichaean heresy was punishable with death; and the same penalty threatened the Audians or the Quartodecimans, who celebrated the festival of Easter on the wrong day. To the reign of Theodosius belonged the glory or the infamy of establishing Inquisitors of Faith, who seem to have been specially enjoined to look after the crime of the Quartodecimans<\/strong> (Smith W. A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology : Oarses-Zygia. J. Murray, 1890 Item notes: v. 3 Original from Harvard University Digitized Jul 8, 2008, p. 1064).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Is killing those that followed the example of Jesus and John, to observe the Passover on the 14th instead of Sunday, a sign of a true Christian leader or a sign of a supporter of antichrist<\/a>? Notice that the office of the \u201cInquisitors\u201d was actually first formed to deal with people who kept Passover on the original biblical date\u2013did you know that the date of Passover was considered to be that important?<\/p>\n Greg Williams wrote of “the bond of peace,” but those who endorsed a Sunday ‘Passover’ (which he and others often call Easter) became murderers.<\/p>\n The Roman Catholic and Orthodox saint John Chrysostom preached the following in 387 A.D.:<\/p>\n In speaking about this feast of the Passover, the Law says to them something such as this: \u201cYou will not be able to keep the Passover in any of the cities which the Lord your God gives to you.\u201d The Law bids them keep the feast on the fourteenth day of the first month and in the city of Jerusalem. The Law also narrowed down the time and place for the observance of Pentecost, when it commanded them to celebrate the feast after seven weeks, and again, when it stated: \u201cIn the place which the Lord your God chooses.\u201d So also the Law fixed the feast of Tabernacles. (4) Now let us see which of the two, time or place, is more necessary, even though neither the one nor the other has the power to save. Must we scorn the place but observe the time? Or should we scorn the time and keep the place? What I mean is something such as this. The Law commanded that the Passover be held in the first month and in Jerusalem, at a prescribed time and in a prescribed place\u2026But the Passover comes to an end on the twenty-first of that month. If they began the feast on the fourteenth day of the first month and then continued it for seven days, they then come to the twenty-first \u2026the Law said they must not observe those rituals outside Jerusalem (John Chrysostom. Homily IV Against the Jews IV:3-4,V:4,5. Catholic Christians of Antioch. Turning to Sabbath and The New Moon Day and Other Holy Days. 387 A.D.).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Although he is correct that the Bible specifies the dates of the Holy Days, John Chrysostom is incorrect that Jerusalem is the only place.<\/p>\n That is never taught in the law.<\/p>\n To the contrary, the Jews were not even in Jerusalem when God listed the holy days in the books of Exodus and Leviticus (Jerusalem was not taken by the children of Israel until after the death of Joshua, see Judges 1:1-8).<\/p>\n Another question is, \u201cWas the church supposed to change its beliefs and practices throughout history or be faithful to what the apostles originally received?\u201d<\/p>\n No, not if the change conflicts with scripture.<\/p>\n The Apostle Jude wrote:<\/p>\n 3 Beloved, while I was very diligent to write to you concerning our common salvation, I found it necessary to write to you exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once for all delivered to the saints<\/strong> (Jude 3).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The reality is that GCI is focused on being, and appearing to be, Protestant to the world.<\/p>\n GCI wants unity with the world.<\/p>\n Its cross-containing logo (see picture at the beginning of this post) was intended to do that.<\/p>\n GCI certainly did not get that from the Bible or the practices of original Christians (for proof, check out the article What is the Origin of the Cross as a ‘Christian’ Symbol?<\/a>).<\/p>\n The Bible warns:<\/p>\n 14 Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? 15 And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? 16 And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said:<\/p>\n \u201cI will dwell in them 17 Therefore<\/p>\n \u201cCome out from among them And be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, And I will receive you. 18 \u2018I will be a Father to you, And you shall be My sons and daughters, Says the Lord Almighty.\u201d (2 Corinthians 6:14-18)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n It is because of scriptures like the above that the faithful had to leave the Tkach WCG, which later changed its name to Grace Communion International.<\/p>\n Anyway, my hope for any still part of GCI is that they will study God’s word, agree to truly live by it, repent, and pray that Jesus would set them free (cf. John 8:32) from Protestant errors and support the most faithful church.<\/p>\n Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n Did Early Christians Celebrate Easter?<\/a> If not, when did this happen? Where did Easter come from? Is Easter supposed to be Passover? What do scholars and the Bible reveal? Here is a link to a related video: Amazing Facts About Easter<\/a>. COGwriter In its latest public letter, Greg Williams, president of Grace Communion International (the current name of the Protestant group that took over and changed the old Worldwide Church of God) had the following: Unity July 20, 2022 During Easter season, we studied John 17\u00a0and explored the prayer of Jesus that he prayed for the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-76466","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-church-history","category-wcg-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n
Unity<\/h2>\n
\nAnd walk among them.
\nI will be their God,
\nAnd they shall be My people.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nBeing Separate: What Did Herbert W. Armstrong and the Bible Teach About Where Not to Fellowship?<\/a> Some believe that it is acceptable to attend groups called COG, but who are not actually. What did Herbert W. Armstrong and the Bible teach about this?
\nHope of Salvation: How the Continuing<\/em> Church of God Differs from Protestantism<\/a> The CCOG is NOT Protestant. This free online book explains how the real <\/em>Church of God differs from mainstream\/traditional Protestants. Several sermons related to the free book are also available: Protestant, Baptist, and CCOG History<\/a>; The First Protestant, God\u2019s Command, Grace, & Character<\/a>; The New Testament, Martin Luther, and the Canon<\/a>; Eucharist, Passover, and Easter<\/a>; Views of Jews, Lost Tribes, Warfare, & Baptism<\/a>; Scripture vs. Tradition, Sabbath vs. Sunday<\/a>; Church Services, Sunday, Heaven, and God\u2019s Plan<\/a><\/a>; Seventh Day Baptists\/Adventists\/Messianics: Protestant or COG?<\/a>; Millennial Kingdom of God and God\u2019s Plan of Salvation<\/a>; Crosses, Trees, Tithes, and Unclean Meats<\/a>; The Godhead and the Trinity<\/a>; Fleeing or Rapture?<\/a>; and Ecumenism, Rome, and CCOG Differences<\/a>.
\nIs God Calling You?<\/a> This booklet discusses topics including calling, election, and selection. If God is calling you, how will you respond? Here is a link to a related sermon: Could God be Calling You?<\/a> A short animation is also available: Is God Calling You?<\/a><\/span>
\nWhat is the Origin of the Cross as a ‘Christian’ Symbol?<\/a> Was the cross used as a venerated symbol by the early Church? Two related YouTube videos would be Beware of the ‘Ecumenical Cross’<\/a>, The Chrislam Cross and the Interfaith Movement<\/a><\/span>, and Origin of the Cross<\/span><\/a>.
\nWhere is the True Christian Church Today?<\/a> This free online pdf booklet answers that question and includes 18 proofs, clues, and signs to identify the true vs. false Christian church. Plus 7 proofs, clues, and signs to help identify Laodicean churches. A related sermon is also available: Where is the True Christian Church? <\/a>Here is a link to the booklet in the Spanish language: \u00bfD\u00f3nde est\u00e1 la verdadera Iglesia cristiana de hoy?<\/a> Here is a link in the German language: WO IST DIE WAHRE CHRISTLICHE KIRCHE HEUTE?<\/a> Here is a link in the French language: O\u00f9 est la vraie \u00c9glise Chr\u00e9tienne aujourd\u2019hui?<\/a> Here is a link to a short animation: <\/b>Which Church would Jesus Choose?<\/a>
\n<\/b>Continuing History of the Church of God<\/a> This pdf booklet is a historical overview of the true Church of God and some of its main opponents from Acts 2 to the 21st century. Related sermon links include Continuing History of the Church of God: c. 31 to c. 300 A.D<\/span><\/a>. and Continuing History of the Church of God: 4th-16th Centuries<\/a> and Continuing History of the Church of God: 17th-20th Centuries<\/a>. The booklet is available in Spanish: Continuaci\u00f3n de la Historia de la Iglesia de Dios<\/a>, German: Kontinuierliche Geschichte der Kirche Gottes<\/a>, French: L \u0019Histoire Continue<\/em> de l \u0019\u00c9glise de Dieu<\/a> and Ekegusii Omogano Bw\u2019ekanisa Ya Nyasae Egendererete<\/a>.
\nBeware: Protestants Going Towards Ecumenical Destruction!<\/a> What is going on in the Protestant world? Are Protestants turning back to their ‘mother church’ in Rome? Does the Bible warn about this? What are Catholic plans and prophecies related to this? Is Protestantism doomed? See also World Council of Churches Peace Plan<\/a>.
\nBeing Separate: What Did Herbert W. Armstrong and the Bible Teach About Where Not to Fellowship?<\/a> Some believe that it is acceptable to attend groups called COG, but who are not actually. What did Herbert W. Armstrong and the Bible teach about this?
\nThe MYSTERY of GOD\u2019s PLAN Why Did God Create Anything? Why did God make you? <\/a> This free online book helps answers some of the biggest questions that human have.<\/span> Here is a link to two related sermons: Mysteries of God’s Plan<\/a> and <\/span>Mysteries of Truth, Sin, Rest, Suffering, and God’s Plan<\/a>.
\nThe Sabbath in the Early Church and Abroad<\/a> Was the seventh-day (Saturday) Sabbath observed by the apostolic and post-apostolic Church? Here is a related sermon video The Christian Sabbath and How and Why to Keep It<\/span><\/a>.
\nCOGwriter Position on Other Churches and Religions<\/a> What is the fate of those who do not know Christ? What about those who profess Christ outside the Church of God?
\nUniversal OFFER of Salvation, Apokatastasis: Can God save the lost in an age to come? Hundreds of scriptures reveal God\u2019s plan of salvation<\/a> Will all get a fair chance at salvation? This free book is packed with scriptures showing that God does intend to offer salvation to all who ever lived\u2013the elect in this age, and the rest in the age to come. Here is a link to a related sermon series: Universal Offer of Salvation 1: Apocatastasis<\/a>, Universal Offer of Salvation 2: Jesus Desires All to be Saved<\/a>, Mysteries of the Great White Throne Judgment (<\/a>Universal Offer of Salvation part 3)<\/a>, Is God Fair<\/a>, Will God Pardon the Ignorant?<\/a>, Can God Save Your Relatives?<\/a>, Babies, Limbo, Purgatory and God\u2019s Plan<\/a>, and \u2018By the Mouth of All His Holy Prophets\u2019<\/a>.
\nJoyce’s Pictures of the Pasadena Campus of Ambassador College and the former Headquarters of the old Worldwide Church of God<\/a> Here is some pictures of the old campus taken in 2016 for those interested in what it did look like and what remains.
\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"