{"id":7974,"date":"2011-07-30T06:25:55","date_gmt":"2011-07-30T14:25:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=7974"},"modified":"2011-07-30T06:08:00","modified_gmt":"2011-07-30T14:08:00","slug":"universe-made-for-human-life-atoms-should-help-prove-god-exists-to-scientists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/doctrine\/universe-made-for-human-life-atoms-should-help-prove-god-exists-to-scientists\/","title":{"rendered":"Universe Made for Human Life, Atoms Should Help Prove God Exists to Scientists"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nDepiction of solar particles interacting with Earth\u2019s magnetosphere<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

New Scientist<\/em> admits that some things about the universe are just right for life on planet Earth, kind of like God intended it:<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

IT HAS been called the Goldilocks paradox. If the strong nuclear force which glues atomic nuclei together were only a few per cent stronger than it is, stars like the sun would exhaust their hydrogen fuel in less than a second. Our sun would have exploded long ago and there would be no life on Earth. If the weak nuclear force were a few per cent weaker, the heavy elements that make up most of our world wouldn’t be here, and neither would you.<\/span><\/p>\n

If gravity were a little weaker than it is, it would never have been able to crush the core of the sun sufficiently to ignite the nuclear reactions that create sunlight; a little stronger and, again, the sun would have burned all of its fuel billions of years ago. Once again, we could never have arisen.<\/span><\/p>\n

Such instances of the fine-tuning of the laws of physics seem to abound. Many of the essential parameters of nature – the strengths of fundamental forces and the masses of fundamental particles – seem fixed at values that are “just right” for life to emerge. A whisker either way and we would not be here. It is as if the universe was made for us.<\/span><\/p>\n

What are we to make of this? One possibility is that the universe was fine-tuned by a supreme being – God. Although many people like this explanation, scientists see no evidence that a supernatural entity is orchestrating the cosmos. <\/span>http:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/mg21128221.500-existence-why-is-the-universe-just-right-for-us.html<\/a><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A few scriptures come to mind about the scientists who ignore evidence of a Creator:<\/p>\n

7 always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.\u00a0 (2 Timothy 3:7)<\/p>\n

20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools (Romans 1:20-22)<\/p>\n

1 The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, and have done abominable iniquity (Psalm 53:1)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In a commentary this week<\/a>, Robert McMinn, of the Living Church of God<\/a>, wrote:<\/p>\n

Although the existence of atoms is considered an undisputed scientific truth today, it has not always been so. In the early history of man\u2019s search for physical knowledge, some believed in atoms and some did not. But what can the current proof of the existence of atoms tell us about the existence of God?<\/p>\n

\u201cWow! They\u2019re real!\u201d is probably not the expression my co-workers expected to hear from me as we were shown one of the very first images ever obtained of actual atoms. You see, atoms are so small that imaging them has eluded the ability of even the most sophisticated electron microscopes until very recently.<\/p>\n

Of course, what we saw weren\u2019t the atoms themselves, but an image of the atoms. Nevertheless, I was so elated by this revelation that I wore a smile for the rest of the day, much to the enjoyment of my peers who reveled in my apparent na\u00efvet\u00e9. Since I had never questioned the existence of atoms before, nor proven for myself that atoms actually existed, seeing them had a profound effect on me. I had to see the atoms, it seems, before I really believed they existed. My co-workers did not. They had proven to themselves the existence of atoms long before they could see them.<\/p>\n

How could they do this? Because things that are unseen may often be made known by things that are seen. One may have faith in the unseen on that basis. Then, when one finally sees what has previously been unseen, one\u2019s faith is confirmed by sight. This is why the existence of atoms has become a scientifically accepted truth. Scientists were willing to believe in the unseen atom because of its specific effects on what they could see, long before they could actually see an image of the atom itself.<\/p>\n

How did that belief come about? In 450 BCE, a Greek philosopher named Democritus first proposed that matter was composed of tiny and indivisible particles called atoms. However, Aristotle dismissed the idea as worthless, and scientific progress was stifled until the 1800\u2019s when scientist John Dalton postulated that these atoms control the way matter is formed and the way matter behaves.<\/p>\n

Step by step, Democritus and Dalton were proved right by scientists who accurately observed the world around them and sought out the simplest and most complete explanation of what they observed. Thanks to this, we now know that atoms come in many different shapes and sizes, and have fantastic applications with measurable properties.<\/p>\n

Why should this be significant to anyone who considers the existence and nature of God? Just as the existence of invisible atoms can be proved by their effects on what is visible, so can the existence of an invisible God be proved by the characteristics of the visible universe. Paul wrote, \u201cFor since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse\u201d (Romans 1:20). It is certainly foolish to deny the existence of invisible atoms in the presence of so much visible evidence to the contrary. For the same reason, only \u201cthe fool has said in his heart, \u2018There is no God\u2019\u201d (Psalm 14:1).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is a Creator God.\u00a0 Real scientists understand that.<\/p>\n

Some articles of related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n

Is God’s Existence Logical?<\/a> Some say it is not logical to believe in God. Is that true?
\nIs Evolution Probable or Impossible or Is God’s Existence Logical? Part II<\/a> This short article clearly answers what ‘pseudo-scientists’ refuse to acknowledge.
\nWhere Did God Come From?<\/a> Any ideas? And how has God been able to exist? Who is God?
\nHow is God Omnipotent, Omnipresent, and Omniscient?<\/a> Here is a biblical article by Wallace Smith which answers what many really wonder about it.
\nWhat is the Meaning of Life?<\/a> Who does God say is happy? What is your ultimate destiny? Do you really know? Does God actually have a plan for YOU personally?
\nThe Bible: Fact or Fiction?<\/a> This is a booklet written by Douglas Winnail that answers if the Bible is just a collection of myths and legends or the inspired word of God.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Depiction of solar particles interacting with Earth\u2019s magnetosphere COGwriter New Scientist admits that some things about the universe are just right for life on planet Earth, kind of like God intended it: IT HAS been called the Goldilocks paradox. If the strong nuclear force which glues atomic nuclei together were only a few per cent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cog-news","category-doctrine"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7974"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7975,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7974\/revisions\/7975"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}