{"id":81598,"date":"2023-06-28T00:01:59","date_gmt":"2023-06-28T08:01:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=81598"},"modified":"2023-06-29T04:06:38","modified_gmt":"2023-06-29T12:06:38","slug":"experts-and-fact-checkers-are-often-false-pushers-of-parts-of-satans-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/doctrine\/experts-and-fact-checkers-are-often-false-pushers-of-parts-of-satans-agenda\/","title":{"rendered":"‘Experts and fact checkers’ are often false pushers of parts of Satan’s agenda"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nOriginal illustration from “The Emperor’s New Clothes”<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

‘Fact checkers’ and ‘experts’ want people to believe all kinds of things these days.<\/p>\n

Many people go along with them because they are afraid they will be embarrassed or somehow harmed by standing for the truth when it goes against the ‘consensus of experts.’<\/p>\n

Well, this is fine when the experts actually are experts and they are actually right.<\/p>\n

But this is not fine when the experts, and even so-called “fact checkers,” are wrong.<\/p>\n

We have seen a lot of this with COVID-19. Unnecessary fear mongering, economic destruction, and dissing useful nutrients like vitamins C and D and minerals like zinc. Plus pushing political agendas on things like vaccines. Plus, places like Google, YouTube, and Facebook have censored opposing scientific views, so people tend to get bombarded with a mainstream view of science, which has not been based on a true consensus of scientists.<\/p>\n

During these COVID shut downs in California, I repeatedly brought up a story to people I talked with that was written by Hans Christian Anderson in the early 19th century.<\/p>\n

Here is a summary of the story from Wikipedia<\/em>:<\/p>\n

“The Emperor’s New Clothes<\/b>” (Danish<\/a>: Kejserens nye kl\u00e6der<\/i>) is a short tale written by Danish author Hans Christian Andersen<\/a>, about two weavers who promise an emperor<\/a> a new suit of clothes that they say is invisible to those who are unfit for their positions, stupid, or incompetent \u2013 while in reality, they make no clothes at all, making everyone<\/i> believe the clothes are invisible to them. When the emperor parades before his subjects in his new “clothes”, no one dares to say that they do not see any suit of clothes on him for fear that they will be seen as stupid. Finally a child cries out, “But he isn’t wearing anything at all!” (The Emperor’s New Clothes, Wikipedia, accessed 06\/01\/19<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Why mention this now?<\/p>\n

First of all, it seems to confirm the view everyone has self-doubts and often will like to rely on the crowd. And this has included leading politicians in many nations related to COVID-19.<\/p>\n

So consider that many ‘experts’ are currently wrong on many matters (and not just COVID-19).<\/p>\n

Furthermore, deceit from leaders\/experts is part of Satan’s plan to discredit the Bible and biblical morality.<\/p>\n

Now, let’s simply look at four other areas where the consensus of experts is wrong.<\/p>\n

The first has to do with the Exodus of the children of Israel out of Egypt. Wikipedia–which claims to be unbiased and factual, states:<\/p>\n

The Exodus<\/b> is the founding myth<\/a> of the Israelites<\/a>.[1]<\/a><\/sup>[a]<\/a><\/sup> … There is an almost universal consensus among scholars that the Exodus story is best understood as myth;[35]<\/a><\/sup> more specifically, it is a “charter” (or foundation) myth, a story told to explain a society’s origins and to provide the ideological foundation for its culture and institutions.[1]<\/a><\/sup> While some continue to discuss the potential historicity or plausibility of the Exodus story, the overwhelming majority have abandoned it as “a fruitless pursuit” (Dever, 2001).[36]<\/a><\/sup>[37]<\/a><\/sup> There is no indication that the Israelites<\/a> ever lived in Ancient Egypt<\/a>, and the Sinai Peninsula<\/a> shows no sign of any occupation for the entire 2nd millennium BCE (even Kadesh-Barnea<\/a>, where the Israelites are said to have spent 38 years, was uninhabited prior to the establishment of the Israelite monarchy).[38]<\/a><\/sup> (The Exodus, Wikipedia, accessed 06\/01\/19)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Basically, the consensus of Wikipedia’s<\/em> experts is that the biblical account is wrong. And while it cites sources, Wikipedia<\/em> is often citing biased and inaccurate ones.<\/p>\n

One of the reasons for this is that many scholars have assumed, for various reasons, that it supposedly should have occurred around 1250 B.C. Based upon that time period, there is no evidence that they see in Egypt or in the Palestinian region that supports the view that great numbers of Israelites left Egypt and settled in the area that ancient Israel came to dominate.<\/p>\n

Yet, there is also an interesting piece of evidence that blasts a hole in the theory that the Exodus was in the 13th century and there is no evidence that the children of Israel ever lived in Egypt. This has to do with a find called the Soleb Temple Inscription that has been dated to c. 1385 B.C. (the fourteenth century B.C.), which also shows that the children of Israel were where the Bible indicates that they were. Here is the hieroglyphic inscription:<\/p>\n

\n
\n\n\n\n
\"tA\"<\/td>\n\"M8\"<\/td>\n\"M23\"<\/td>\n\"w\"<\/td>\n\"i\"<\/td>\n\"i\"<\/td>\n\"h\"<\/td>\n\"V4\"<\/td>\n\"w\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Here is information about it:<\/p>\n

The \u2026 hieroglyphic rendering corresponds very precisely to the Hebrew tetragrammaton YHWH, or Yahweh, and antedates the hitherto oldest occurrence of that divine name \u2013 on the Moabite Stone \u2013 by over five hundred years. (Astour, Michael C. (1979). \u201cYahweh in Egyptian Topographic Lists.\u201d In Festschrift Elmar Edel,<\/em> eds. M. Gorg & E. Pusch, Bamberg, as cited by Wikipedia)<\/p>\n

Of particular interest is the Shasu name that has attached to it the element<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\"i\"<\/td>\n\"i\"<\/td>\n\"h\"<\/td>\n\"V4\"<\/td>\n\"w\"<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

which reads yhw3.<\/em> Because this linguistically corresponds to the Hebrew YHWH, it was quickly associated with the personal name of the God of Israel. \u2026 The initial response to the occurance of the topomyn \u201cShasu land of Yahwa\u201d led many scholars to conclude that this name points to a geographical territory where a cult of Yahwa existed in the fourteenth century B.C. This interpretation is strengthened by the proximty of Seir in the same list. Thus it has been thought that the \u201cShasu land of Yahwa\u201d was in the same region as the Shasu in the land of Seir \u2026 Thus this Egyptian evidence seems to support the theory that Israel spent time in the very region the Bible suggests. (Hoffmeier JK. Ancient Israel in Sinai: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition<\/span>. Oxford University Press, USA, 2005<\/span>, p. 242)<\/p>\n

The Soleb Temple Inscription, which is an Egyptian hieroglyphic inscription, dates to ca. 1385 BC. This inscription, which comes from the reign of Pharaoh Amenhotep III, is found in an Egyptian temple at Soleb in which is today northern Sudan.<\/p>\n

The Soleb Inscription, which is on a stone column base and which is written on the body of a bound enemy soldier, refers to a people called the \u201cShasu of Yahweh.\u201d Shasu<\/em> is a term used in ancient Egypt for semi-nomadic\u2013generally Semitic\u2013peoples with herd animals, who lived almost exclusively to the east and west of the Jordan River. All Shasu tribes were seen as the mortal enemies by the Egyptians.<\/p>\n

The entire Soleb Inscription reads \u201cthe land of the Shasu of Yahweh.\u201d It is highly probable that the Shasu mentioned in the Soleb Inscription were the Israelites who had just invaded into Canaan under Joshua. Incidentally, there is no archaeological evidence that the ancient Egyptians ever exercised any administrate authority in the Shasu lands east of the Jordan River.<\/p>\n

The name Yahweh in the Soleb Inscription is recognized by nearly all ancient historians and archeologists today as the very name for God\u2013Jehovah in some English translations\u2013that is found in the Hebrew Old Testament. Exodus 3:13-15 indicates that Yahweh was a new name for God that was first revealed to Moses at the Burning Bush just prior to the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt.<\/p>\n

After being commissioned by Yahweh as his representative, Moses and his brother Aaron went to the Pharaoh of Egypt. Exodus 5:1-2 records that discourse between Moses and Pharaoh during their first meeting, and this meeting is highly relevant to this discussion on the date of the Exodus. It reads:<\/p>\n

Afterwards Moses and Aaron went to Pharaoh and said, \u201cThus says Yahweh, the God [Elohim] of Israel, \u2018let my people go that they may hold a feast to me wilderness.’\u201d But Pharaoh said, \u201cWho is Yahweh that I should obey his voice and let Israel go. I do not know Yahweh, and I will not let Israel go.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It is clear from this passage of Scripture that the Pharaoh of the Exodus had never heard of a God named Yahweh. However, Pharaoh Amenhotep III (ruled ca. 1391-1354 BC) clearly had heard of Yahweh since he mentions him by name in the Soleb Inscription.<\/p>\n

Since Pharaoh Amenhotep III knew of Yahweh in ca. 1385 BC and since the name Yahweh is not used until the life of Moses, then the Exodus of the Israelites from Egypt must have happened before ca. 1385 BC. This makes the Late Date of the Exodus in ca. 1265 BC under Pharaoh Ramses II (ruled ca. 1279-1212 BC) untenable for Bible believers! (Billington C. The New Crossway Archaeology Study Bible Reviewed. Artifax, Summer 2018, pp. 21-22)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Thus, the Soleb Temple Inscription supports a fifteenth century B.C. exodus of the children of Israel from Egypt like many of us have pointed to for years.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nIpuwer Papyrus (Wikipedia)<\/em><\/p>\n

There is also evidence that the ten plagues took place in something called the Ipuwer<\/em> papyrus (see Reasons, Proofs, and Ramifications of the Ten Plagues of Exodus<\/a><\/span>). But the ‘experts’ at Wikipedia<\/em> and other anti-biblical sources discount it.<\/p>\n

Anti-biblical ‘experts,’ however want to deny what is in the Bible as well as the Ipuwer Papyrus<\/em>. Notice:<\/p>\n

According to Egyptian scholars, we are supposed to believe that it was very popular back in Ipuwer\u2019s day to write lamentation types of literature that had no connection to real events. … We must also beware of scholars who claim contra statements in the Papyrus that are not true. For instance, Enmarch (2011) says that the Ipuwer poem contradicts the Bible because it speaks of an invasion of Asians, rather than a large-scale emigration. In fact, immediately after the Exodus, with the Egyptian army destroyed, there was no longer any manned defense against the Asian hordes who constantly wanted to get into Egypt from the east. The building of defense walls along the eastern border of Egypt by Amenemhat I at the beginning of the 12th Dynasty to keep Asiatics out is well documented by historians (e.g., see Shaw 2003, pp. 147\u2500148). But now these people could walk right in. (Habermehl, A. 2018. The Ipuwer Papyrus and the Exodus. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Creationism, ed. J.H. Whitmore, pp. 1\u20136. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Creation Science Fellowship).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So, on the one hand, the anti-biblical ‘experts\u2019 claim there is no evidence to support the ten plagues and the exodus, hence the Book of Exodus is false. Yet on the other hand, when presented with evidence, they claim that it was also untrue. Those are not unbiased, truth-seeking experts.<\/p>\n

Yet, despite that, along with other information, Wikipedia quotes some ‘experts’ as saying that looking for evidence of the story of the Exodus is a “fruitless pursuit.”<\/p>\n

In other words, they want you to feel stupid if you disagree or even want to look for biblical proof.<\/p>\n

Sounds like something Satan would like.<\/p>\n

To take that a step further, certain ‘experts’ try to claim that there is insufficient proof that Jesus even existed and that the Gospels are unreliable.<\/p>\n

Yet, these are mainly simply assertions of those who will not accept the truth.<\/p>\n

Those willing to accept the truth, including historical evidence, should accept that Jesus not only existed, but that He was the prophesied Messiah (for many details, check out the free online book: Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Now, one fact that the anti-Jesus, anti-Gospel ‘experts’ overlook is that Jesus made at least eleven statements in the New Testament that have been confirmed by events recorded by historians outside of the New Testament. Those and other proofs are in the free online book: Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Various ‘experts’ want to discount Jesus, because they do not want to accept what He taught.<\/p>\n

Now, one of the things that Jesus taught was that the Book of Genesis was true.<\/p>\n

Well, the ‘experts’ at places like Wikipedia do not want you to believe that. Notice:<\/p>\n

Genesis is perhaps best seen as an example of a creation myth<\/a>, a type of literature telling of the first appearance of humans, the stories of ancestors and heroes, and the origins of culture, cities and so forth. (Book of Genesis, Wikipedia, accessed 06\/01\/19)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Again, the credibility of scripture is being attacked.<\/p>\n

Yet, the account in Genesis is true. God created life.<\/p>\n

But what about the ‘consensus of experts’?<\/p>\n

Notice the following from Nobel Prize winner Dr. George Wald, of Harvard University, on the origin of life:<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"
\nThe late Dr. George Wald (Molendijk, Bart\/Anefo)<\/em><\/p>\n

The reasonable view was to believe in spontaneous generation (life from nothing); the only alternative, to believe in a single, primary act of supernatural creation. There is no third position . . . One has only to contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible.<\/strong> Yet here we are, as a result I believe, of spontaneous generation. (Scott I. The God Solution: Are You Ready? Xlibris Corporation, 2013, p. 41)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is an astounding admission. The ‘expert’ Dr. Wald is saying that he chose to believe the impossible. And \u201cscientists\u201d claim that those who believe in a Creator have blind faith with no proof, but instead believe the impossible!<\/p>\n

Merriam-Webster\u2019s dictionary defines impossible as \u201cincapable of being or of occurring.\u201d<\/p>\n

It is a falsehood to believe in something that is impossible.<\/p>\n

Like the people in the Emperor story, he is claiming to see something that he obviously cannot see.<\/p>\n

Yet, I suspect that if he claimed to believe in the possible–that is a Divine Creation–he never would have gotten a Nobel Prize.<\/p>\n

What evolutionists like to point to are surveys that suggest those with higher levels of education believe in it more than those with lesser formal education. But that proves nothing.<\/p>\n

They also falsely try to tell us that the evolutionary explanation of the origin of life is scientific.<\/p>\n

The Bible warns of \u201cscience, falsely so-called\u201d (1 Timothy 6:20, KJV).<\/p>\n

Most with ‘higher education’ go along with the evolutionary, nonsensical explanation, because of peer-pressure, anti-biblical bias, as well as to appear to be properly ‘educated\u2019.<\/p>\n

Yet, those of us who have studied cellular biology should realize that spontaneous generation of life is illogical–and I do have a Ph.D. in a biological field.<\/p>\n

Even Charles Darwin made an interesting admission in his book, The Origin of the Species<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nCharles Darwin<\/em><\/p>\n

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down (Darwin C. The Origin of Species<\/em>. In Chapter 6, Difficulties on Theory. Cricket House Books LLC, 2010, p. 124).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And although he did not believe that was demonstrated to his satisfaction when he wrote that, the truth is that cellular life was simply much more complex than he at that time realized (DNA was discovered shortly after he wrote the above).<\/p>\n

But most of the modern ‘educated’ act contrary to biological reality. The shadow of the Emperor story is manifest today.<\/p>\n

But it is more than that.<\/p>\n

For our fourth, consider the following:<\/p>\n

If you wonder where \u201cprogressivism\u201d is headed, look no further than the self-mutilation movement<\/strong> where LGBT followers physically maim their own bodies<\/a> to become so-called \u201cnullos\u201d by cutting off their nipples and reproductive organs. The next escalation in this war on biology will, I predict, involve parents maiming their newborn infants<\/strong> by slicing off their penis and scrotum shortly after birth in order to \u201crid\u201d the child of gender inequality.<\/p>\n

This physical maiming of newborn infants will be embraced by the Democrats and Leftists as a \u201cprogressive\u201d way to achieve \u201cgender equality.\u201d …<\/p>\n

The LGBT community already absurdly claims that children are born \u201cgenderless\u201d and then \u201cassigned\u201d a gender by the doctor. This dangerous, delusional thinking will justify parents grabbing scalpels and physically maiming their newborn children in order to achieve a \u201ccorrection\u201d for their genderless status by violently removing all organs and tissues that are not gender-neutral. Yes, it\u2019s completely insane and criminal, but this is exactly the way the lunatic Left now thinks. …<\/p>\n

My question is: Will any institution in society stand up against the increasingly deranged, child-killing and child-mutilating \u201cprogressivism\u201d that\u2019s now being pushed everywhere? Are there any doctors in America who will denounce parents maiming their own children in the pursuit of gender equality? Somehow, doctors are more than willing to call the police on parents who refuse to have their children subjected to toxic chemotherapy, but there\u2019s little question those same doctors will stand by and say nothing while parents commit felony assault against their own children with a scalpel and an ice pack\u2026 all in the name of \u201cprogressivism.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Left in America today has become a dangerous obedience cult<\/strong> that\u2019s obsessed with death and self-mutilation. Until they are stopped, their agenda will continue to become more twisted, insane and psychopathic. https:\/\/governmentslaves.news\/2019\/05\/25\/lgbt-progressivism-horrors-parents-to-start-physically-maiming-their-own-babies-to-slice-off-all-gender-organs-in-the-name-of-progressivism-and-equality\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Males are different than females.<\/p>\n

One need only look at male and female bodies to realize that.<\/p>\n

But even beyond that, scientists now realize there are many unseen genetic differences:<\/p>\n

4 May 2017<\/p>\n

Researchers have revealed a breakthrough is how the sexes really differ from each other.<\/p>\n

A groundbreaking genetic study pinponted 6500 genes that differ between men and women.<\/p>\n

Experts say it could have a profound effect in the way we identify and treat everything from disease to fertility. http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/sciencetech\/article-4475252\/There-6-500-genetic-differences-men-women.html#ixzz4l2KCqvLW<\/a><\/p>\n

May 7, 2017<\/p>\n

A biological male can take hormones, surgically alter his body and identify as \u201cfemale,\u201d but the procedures still won\u2019t make him a woman, according to new evidence found by Israeli researchers.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s because there are at least 6,500 genes that contain sex-specific instructions for males and females.<\/p>\n

For the study by Israel\u2019s Weizmann Institute of Science<\/a>, professor Shmuel Pietrokovski and Dr. Moran Gershoni, both researchers from the institute\u2019s Molecular Genetics Department, \u201clooked closely at around 20,000 protein-coding genes, sorting them by sex and searching for differences in expression in each tissue. They eventually identified around 6,500 genes with activity that was biased toward one sex or the other in at least one tissue, adding to the already major biological differences between men and women.\u201d …<\/p>\n

The new findings are further evidence that biological males cannot simply \u201ctransition\u201d into females and vice versa, argues Mat Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis recent study from Israel\u2019s Weizmann Institute of Science further proves that you cannot fool Mother Nature,\u201d Staver said. \u201cThe saying, \u2018I think, therefore, I am\u2019 is best left to philosophy and not science. Gender confusion is mental, not physical or biological. God made male and female, and no amount of protestation will change the natural created order.\u201d<\/p>\n

Staver called the idea that a person can choose his or her gender \u201cfiction.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThese Israeli scientists identified over 6,500 genes with activity that was biased toward one sex or the other in at least one tissue,\u201d he said. \u201cThat clearly validates the genetic differences between men and women.\u201d http:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2017\/05\/study-more-proof-a-man-can-never-become-a-woman\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Another difference between males and females has to do with the brain.<\/p>\n

\n

Proof that girls and boys are born to be different: Controversial study finds that brain differences between the sexes begin in the womb<\/h2>\n

25 March 2019<\/p>\n

In a scientific first, researchers claim to have found that differences between men\u2019s and women\u2019s brains start in the womb.<\/p>\n

The conclusion is likely to be controversial, with some experts claiming social influences are more important.<\/p>\n

But scientists who did brain scans of 118 foetuses in the second half of pregnancy to analyse the links between gender and the connectivity of a developing brain believe the differences are biological. \u2026<\/p>\n

According to the US study, published in the journal Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, female brains growing in the uterus produced \u2018long-range\u2019 networks.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Professor Thomason said this was less true of boys, who were \u2018more susceptible to environmental influences\u2019. https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/health\/article-6845991\/Controversial-study-finds-brain-differences-sexes-begin-womb.html<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

While I do not think that this is necessarily \u201ca scientific first\u201d (as others noted brain development differences between male and female brains in utero<\/em>), it is at least additional proof that boys and girls are biologically different in a way that is not clearly visually seen.<\/p>\n

Since this study involved the unborn, it also helps negate the false narrative that ‘gender’ is not biological, but the result of societal environmental factors.<\/p>\n

Of course, many ‘moderns’ want to act like there is no difference, but the Bible is clear that men and women are different. God warned that there would be those “who suppress the truth in unrighteousness” (Romans 1:18). But the truth is still the truth.<\/p>\n

The Bible warns against not only sexual immorality, but approving it:<\/p>\n

20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools<\/strong>, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man \u2014 and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things.<\/p>\n

24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves<\/strong>, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.<\/p>\n

26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, sexual immorality, wickedness, covetousness<\/strong>, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil-mindedness; they are whisperers, 30 backbiters, haters of God, violent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things<\/strong>, disobedient to parents, 31 undiscerning, untrustworthy, unloving, unforgiving, unmerciful; 32 who, knowing the righteous judgment of God, that those who practice such things are deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them<\/strong>. (Romans 1:20-32)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The USA is not benefiting from homosexuality or the transgender agenda. Surgically changing one’s sex organs is dishonoring one’s body. Pretending to be a sex other than what one was born as is not wise (the exceptionally rare people born with both sets of genitalia is another matter, which is beyond the scope of this article).<\/p>\n

God made humans male and female:<\/p>\n

27 So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them. (Genesis 1:27)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Nowhere in the Bible is any human considered to be any sex\/gender other than male or female. And those who act otherwise are warned against (Deuteronomy 22:5; 1 Corinthians 6:10-12; Romans 1:18-32). One is not a different gender than their actual genitalia.<\/p>\n

But many others have their own, antibiblical ideas. Yet:<\/p>\n

33 God is not the author of confusion (1 Corinthians 14:33)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The LGBTQ agenda encourages and exploits confusion. It is NOT good for those who consider themselves LGBTQ either. Now that does not mean you cannot comply with absurd ‘pronoun’ laws if you must.<\/p>\n

Yet, more than that, those advocating the LGBTQ+ agenda want YOU to approve it and promote it. Even though YOU should know that men and women are not the same and that the type of sexual acts that gays and lesbians do are opposed to nature and the purpose of natural organs.<\/p>\n

And they expect you to NOT raise an objection.<\/p>\n

And in the 21st century, they may try to destroy your career, reputation, and other matters if you do not pretend to see what they want you to see.<\/p>\n

In the Emperor story, the two scoundrels did not really look trustworthy.<\/p>\n

\"\"
\nOriginal illustration of the swindlers in “The Emperor’s New Clothes”<\/em><\/p>\n

However, most experts do not look like scoundrels these days.<\/p>\n

And there are even religious leaders who promote many of the lies that I mentioned in this article.<\/p>\n

But even that was predicted.<\/p>\n

13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into apostles of Christ. 14 And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light. 15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works. (2 Corinthians 11:13-15)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Related to Protestant ministers, some may wish to read the free online book: Hope of Salvation: How the Continuing<\/em> Church of God differs from Protestantism<\/a><\/span>.<\/p>\n

Consider also the following:<\/p>\n

2 You shall not follow a crowd to do evil; (Exodus 23:2)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But, by trying to make it sound like only the stupid accept the Exodus, accept Jesus as Messiah, believe in a Divine Creation, and think men and women are different, the ‘experts’ are basically doing what the vast majority of the people in the Emperor story did.<\/p>\n

That story remains very relevant today.<\/p>\n

We now also have highly biased “artificial intelligence” search engines which also pretend to know things that are not accurate (e.g.\u00a0ChatGPT 4? Has ChatGPT gone woke?<\/a> and PETA uses ChatGPT to make blasphemous Bible<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Notice what the Apostle Paul wrote related to deceivers getting worse and worse, but that Christians need to still heed the scriptures:<\/p>\n

12 Yes, and all who desire to live godly in Christ Jesus will suffer persecution. 13 But evil men and impostors will grow worse and worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14 But you must continue in the things which you have learned and been assured of, knowing from whom you have learned them, 15 and that from childhood you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.\u00a0 (2 Timothy 3:12-15)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Understand that Satan wants you to:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Doubt the Book of Exodus<\/li>\n
  2. Doubt the creation in Genesis<\/li>\n
  3. Doubt Jesus and the Bible<\/li>\n
  4. Embrace sexual immorality and confusion<\/li>\n
  5. Put your trust in humankind’s solutions to problems and NOT Jesus and the coming Kingdom of God<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    The Bible teaches:<\/p>\n

    160 The entirety of Your word is truth, (Psalm 119:160)<\/p>\n

    4 Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar. (Romans 3:4)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Believe the word of God.<\/p>\n

    Sadly, more and more experts are shown to be liars.<\/p>\n

    Those ‘experts’ have no clothes.<\/p>\n

    And we in Continuing Church of God<\/a> are calling them out on this.<\/p>\n

    We also put together the following related video, where there is also more detail about Hans Christian Anderson’s story:<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/a>
    \n24:10 <\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    The ‘Experts’ Have No Clothes!<\/a><\/h3>\n

    In the 19th century, Hans Christian Anderson’s ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’ was published. The story showed a willingness of people to overlook the obvious truth in order to fit in with the crowd. Are aspects of that story applicable now? Are the experts at Wikipedia and elsewhere who claim that the story of the exodus of the children of Israel out of Egypt right that this is a myth or that the creation account in Genesis is a myth? What about the Solbe Temple Inscription and the Ipuwer papyrus? Could Nobel prize winners be wrong? Have they intentionally overlook true science? What about the existence of Jesus or the accuracy of the Gospel writers? Can you prove that Jesus existed? What about the views of certain ‘experts’ about sexual identity and morality? Dr. Thiel addresses each of these points with facts that disagree with the consensus of anti-biblical experts. He explains that like the Emperor who had no clothes, even when the majority claimed to see them, many modern experts are just as wrong and hence figuratively should be considered as having no clothes (of truth).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    \n

    Here is a link to our latest uploaded video: The ‘Experts’ Have No Clothes!<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Some items of possibly related interest may include:<\/em><\/p>\n

    Is God\u2019s Existence Logical?<\/a> Is it really logical to believe in God? Yes! Would you like Christian answers to give atheists? This is a free online booklet that deal with improper theories and musings called science related to the origin of the origin of the universe, the origin of life, and evolution. Two animated videos of related interest are also available: <\/span>Big Bang: Nothing or Creator?<\/a> and A Lifegiver or Spontaneous Evolution?<\/a>
    \n<\/span>EXODUS<\/strong><\/span> Exodus sermons include     Exodus 1-4: Jewish Myths or Lessons for Christians Today?<\/a>, Exodus 5-7: Serpents, Blood, and Revelation<\/a>, Exodus 8-9: Plagues and Prophecy<\/a>, Exodus 10-12: The Last Plagues & 21st Century Prophecies<\/a>, and Exodus 13-15: Passover Protection and Armageddon<\/a>. There is also more, such as the article: When was the Exodus? Did it Happen?<\/a> Some deny the biblical account of the Exodus. Was Ramses II the pharaoh then? When did the Exodus occur? Is there proof outside of the Bible that there was an Exodus? Here is a related article in the Spanish language: \u00bfCu\u00e1ndo fue el \u00c9xodo? \u00bfOcurri\u00f3 realmente?<\/a> Also: Reasons, Proofs, and Ramifications of the Ten Plagues of Exodus<\/a> What do you know about these plagues? What happened to the ‘gods of Egypt’? Is there any confirmation outside the Bible? Might something worse be coming? A related two-part sermon is available: Egypt and the Plagues<\/a> (Part 1) and Exodus Plagues and Prophecy<\/a> (Part 2). Also: Exodus and the Days of Unleavened Bread<\/a> This article discusses parts of the Book of Exodus with some connections to the Days of Unleavened Bread<\/a>. Related sermons are available Exodus 1-4: Jewish Myths or Lessons for Christians Today?<\/a>, Exodus 5-7: Serpents, Blood, and Revelation<\/a>, <\/span>Exodus 8-9: Plagues and Prophecy<\/a> and Unleavened Bread: Lessons in Exodus<\/a>. Another sermon is <\/span>Exodus, Judgments, and Jesus<\/a>. Also Exodus 4:24, Why would God have sought to kill Moses?<\/a> What did Moses do wrong? Do you have a similar problem? Another article is Exodus 16-19<\/a> which covers all of those verses–here is a link to a related sermon: Exodus 16-19: Manna, Governance, and End Time Protection<\/a>. Another article is Exodus 20<\/a> which covers all of the verses in that chapter–here is a link to a related sermon: Exodus 20: The Ten Commandments<\/a>.<\/span> Another article covers the verses in those chapters Exodus 21-24: These are the Judgments<\/a><\/span>\u2013here is a link to a related sermon: Exodus 21-24: Judgments<\/a>. Here is a link to the article Exodus 25: Ark of the Covenant and Mercy Seat<\/a>—here is a link to a related sermon: Exodus 25: Ark of the Covenant and the Mercy Seat<\/a>.<\/span> Here is a link to the article Exodus 26-32 Tabernacle, Sacrifices, & the Book of Life<\/a><\/span>—here is a link to a related sermon:<\/span>Exodus 26-32: Tabernacle, Golden Calf, and Book of Life<\/a>.
    \n<\/span>    Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a> This free book has over 200 Hebrew prophecies were fulfilled by Jesus. Plus, His arrival was consistent with specific prophecies and even Jewish interpretations of prophecy. Here are links to seven related sermons: Proof Jesus is the Messiah<\/a>, Prophecies of Jesus\u2019 birth, timing, and death<\/a>, Jesus\u2019 prophesied divinity<\/a>, 200+ OT prophecies Jesus filled; Plus prophecies He made<\/a>, Why Don\u2019t Jews Accept Jesus?<\/a>, Daniel 9, Jews, and Jesus<\/a>, and Facts and Atheists’ Delusions About Jesus<\/a>. Plus the links to two sermonettes: Luke\u2019s census: Any historical evidence?<\/a> and Muslims believe Jesus is the Messiah, but<\/a> … These videos cover nearly all of the book, plus have some information not in the book.
    \n<\/span><\/b>    Does it Make Physical Sense to believe in God?<\/a> Some say it is not logical to believe in God. Is that true? Here is a link to a YouTube sermon titled Is it logical to believe in God?<\/a>
    \n    Is Evolution Probable or Impossible or Is God’s Existence Logical? Part II<\/a> This short article clearly answers what ‘pseudo-scientists’ refuse to acknowledge. Here is a link to a YouTube video titled Is There Another View of Evolution?<\/a> and another titled Quickly Disprove Evolution as the Origin of Life<\/a>.
    \n    How Old is the Earth and How Long Were the Days of Creation? Gap Theory?<\/a> Does the Bible allow for the creation of the universe and earth billions of years ago? Why do some believe they are no older than 6,000 years old? What is the gap theory? Were the days of creation in Genesis 1:3 through 2:3 24 hours long? Here are links to two sermons: Gap Theory: Doctrine or Modern Heresy?<\/a> and Genesis, ‘Prehistoric man,’ and the Gap theory<\/a>.<\/span> Here is a link to a related article in Spanish: \u00bfCu\u00e1n vieja es la Tierra? \u00bfCu\u00e1n largos fueron los D\u00edas de la Creaci\u00f3n? \u00bfTeor\u00eda de la brecha?<\/a>
    \n    The MYSTERY of GOD\u2019s PLAN: Why Did God Create Anything? Why Did God Make You? <\/a>This free online book helps answers some of the biggest questions that human have, including the biblical meaning of life. Here is a link to three related sermons: Mysteries of God\u2019s Plan<\/a>, Mysteries of Truth, Sin, Rest, Suffering, and God\u2019s Plan<\/a>, Mystery of Race<\/a>, and The Mystery of YOU<\/a>.
    \n    Hope of Salvation: How the Continuing<\/em> Church of God Differs from Protestantism<\/a> The CCOG is NOT Protestant. This free online book explains how the real <\/em>Church of God differs from mainstream\/traditional Protestants. Several sermons related to the free book are also available: Protestant, Baptist, and CCOG History<\/a>; The First Protestant, God\u2019s Command, Grace, & Character<\/a>; The New Testament, Martin Luther, and the Canon<\/a>; Eucharist, Passover, and Easter<\/a>; Views of Jews, Lost Tribes, Warfare, & Baptism<\/a>; Scripture vs. Tradition, Sabbath vs. Sunday<\/a>; Church Services, Sunday, Heaven, and God\u2019s Plan<\/a><\/a>; Seventh Day Baptists\/Adventists\/Messianics: Protestant or COG?<\/a>; Millennial Kingdom of God and God\u2019s Plan of Salvation<\/a>; Crosses, Trees, Tithes, and Unclean Meats<\/a>; The Godhead and the Trinity<\/a>; Fleeing or Rapture?<\/a>; and Ecumenism, Rome, and CCOG Differences<\/a>.
    \n<\/span>    USA pushing gender confusion<\/a> On May 13, 2016, the Obama Administration sent notices to school districts around the USA on how it wants them to deal with toilets, lockers, sports, and other issues of interest to the LGBT crowd. The Obama Administration has redefined the word \u2018sex\u2019 as written in the 1964 Civil Rights Act as expanded in 1972. Does the Bible teach transgenderism? Are accommodations for those considering themselves transgendered helpful or evil? What does the Bible teach about cross-dressing and other transgender issues? Does the Bible warn of terrible consequences for those who merely approve the LBGT agenda? This is a video.
    \n    Cross-dressing and other assaults against your children. What should you do?<\/a> Is there an agenda to turn your children and\/or grandchildren away from biblical morality and towards practices promoted by homosexuals? What does the Bible teach about cross-dressing? What should parents do? If there is an agenda, what has been going on? There are also two YouTube videos related to this, titled Transgender ‘Woe to those who call evil good’<\/a> and Cross dressing and Other Assaults Against Your Children<\/a>.
    \n    Pornography: A scourge on society<\/a> Is pornography harmless fun? Does the Bible teach anything about it? What are the views of some involved with it? A related sermons is titled: Pornography, False Comfort, and False Religion<\/a>. Here a shorter YouTube video Pornography: Harmless Fun or a Scourge on Society? <\/a>
    \n    The Bible Condemns Homosexuality<\/a> “Same-sex marriage” for “gays” and lesbians is becoming more acceptable to many. What does the Bible teach about homosexuality? Can homosexuals change? A related video sermon is titled: What Does the Bible Really Teach about Homosexuality?
    \n<\/a>    Making Your Marriage Work<\/a> Marriage is not always easy, but it pictures a divine relationship. How can you make your marriage work? Here is a link to the video sermon: You Can Make YOUR Marriage Work<\/a>.
    \n    Love, Marriage, and Sex <\/a>It is important to get them in the right order.
    \n    Husbands Love Your Wives<\/a> An article written by the late Selmer Hegvold.
    \n    Preparing for the ‘Short Work’ and The Famine of the Word<\/a> What is the ‘short work’ of Romans 9:28? Who is preparing for it? Here is a link to a related video sermon titled: The Short Work<\/a>.
    \n    The Final Phase of the Work<\/a> What is the final phase of the work? Who will lead it? Do you have the courage to support it? Here is a related YouTube video titled The Final Phase of the Work. <\/a> The written article has been translated into Spanish La Fase Final de la Obra<\/a>.
    \n    The Gospel of the Kingdom of God<\/a> This free online pdf booklet has answers many questions people have about the Gospel of the Kingdom of God and explains why it is the solution to the issues the world is facing. Here are links to three related sermons: The World\u2019s False Gospel<\/a>, The Gospel of the Kingdom: From the New and Old Testaments<\/a>, and The Kingdom of God is the Solution<\/a>.
    \n    Anglo – America in Prophecy & the Lost Tribes of Israel<\/a> Are the Americans, Canadians, English, Scottish, Welsh, Australians, Anglo-Saxon (non-Dutch) Southern Africans, and New Zealanders descendants of Joseph? Where are the lost ten-tribes of Israel? Who are the lost tribes of Israel? What will happen to Jerusalem and the Jews in Israel? Will God punish the U.S.A., Canada, United Kingdom, and other Anglo-Saxon nations? Why might God allow them to be punished first? Here is a link to the Spanish version of this article: Anglo-Am\u00e9rica & las Tribus Perdidas de Israel<\/a>. Information is also in the YouTube sermons titled Where are the Ten Lost Tribes? Why does it matter?<\/a><\/span> and British are the Covenant People<\/span><\/a>. A short YouTube of prophetic interest may be: Are Chinese threats against Australia for real?<\/a>
    \n    Will the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic Nations be Divided and Have People Taken as Slaves?<\/a> Will the lands of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand be divided? What about Jerusalem? What does Bible prophecy teach? Are there non-biblical prophecies that support this idea? Who will divide those lands? Who will end up with the lands and the people? Here is a link to a video titled Will the USA and other Anglo-nations be Divided and Their People Made Slaves? <\/a> Here is a related item in the Spanish language \u00bfSer\u00e1n divididas las naciones anglosajonas?<\/a>
    \n    British are the Covenant People <\/a> What do \u2018British\u2019 and \u2018Britain\u2019 mean in Hebrew? Are the descendants of the Anglo-Saxons people of the covenant? Does the British royal family connect to the throne of David? What does the Bible teach? What does history show us? Is there any DNA evidence related to British-Israelism? When did Christianity make it to the British Isles? Could Jeremiah have made it to the British Isles? What type of Christians made it to the British Isles? Did the last King of England believe in British Israelism?
    \n    Canada in Prophecy: What Does Bible Prophecy, Catholic Prophecy, and other Predictions Suggest About the Future of Canada?<\/a> There are prophecies that suggest involvement with Canada. And many are not positive about its future. A sermon of related interest is also available: Canada in Prophecy<\/a>.
    \n    Australia and New Zealand in Prophecy<\/a> Do biblical prophecies help explain the wealth blessings for Australia and New Zealand? Might cursings from disobedience come in the 21st century? Here is a link to a related sermon: Australia and New Zealand: Origins and Prophecy<\/a>.
    \n    The ‘Lost Tribe’ of Reuben: France in Prophecy?<\/a> What is the origin of this in France? What is prophesied to happen to them? A two-part sermon related to history and prophecy is available online: The ‘Lost Tribe’ of Reuben<\/a><\/span> and France and Prophecy<\/a>.
    \n    Ten clues tying Belgium and Luxembourg with the tribe of Asher<\/a> Who did some in Belgium and Luxembourg descend from?
    \n    Ten clues tying Zebulun with the Dutch<\/a> Who did some in the Netherlands descend from?
    \n    Ten Prophetic Clues Concerning Naphtali \u2013 Sweden<\/a> Do the Swedes have any ties to the biblical tribe of Naphtali? Some think so
    \n    \u2018Ten Prophetic Clues Concerning Dan \u2013 the Irish\u2019 Not part of the \u2018144,000\u2019 <\/a>Could the Irish and Danes have descent from the tribe of Dan?
    \n    Could Switzerland by descended from Gad? Is it really prepared for what is prophecied? <\/a>This article has clues.
    \n    USA in Prophecy: The Strongest Fortresses<\/a> Can you point to scriptures, like Daniel 11:39, that point to the USA in the 21st century? This article does.<\/span> Two related sermon are available: Identifying the USA and its Destruction in Prophecy<\/a> and Do these 7 prophesies point to the end of the USA?<\/a>
    \n    Who is the King of the West?<\/a> Why is there no Final End-Time King of the West in Bible Prophecy? Is the United States the King of the West? Here is a version in the Spanish language: \u00bfQui\u00e9n es el Rey del Occidente? \u00bfPor qu\u00e9 no hay un Rey del Occidente en la profec\u00eda del tiempo del fin?<\/a> A related sermon is also available: The Bible, the USA, and the King of the West<\/a>. <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Original illustration from “The Emperor’s New Clothes” COGwriter ‘Fact checkers’ and ‘experts’ want people to believe all kinds of things these days. Many people go along with them because they are afraid they will be embarrassed or somehow harmed by standing for the truth when it goes against the ‘consensus of experts.’ Well, this is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81598","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-doctrine"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81598","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81598"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81598\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":82300,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81598\/revisions\/82300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}