{"id":87829,"date":"2024-05-01T15:00:35","date_gmt":"2024-05-01T23:00:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/?p=87829"},"modified":"2024-05-01T14:30:35","modified_gmt":"2024-05-01T22:30:35","slug":"wnd-cdc-knew-covid-shots-caused-deaths-but-lied-with-public-denials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/prophecy\/wnd-cdc-knew-covid-shots-caused-deaths-but-lied-with-public-denials\/","title":{"rendered":"WND: CDC knew COVID shots caused deaths, but lied with public denials"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\n(Pixabay photo)<\/em><\/p>\n

COGwriter<\/a><\/p>\n

World Net Daily<\/em> reported the following:<\/p>\n

\n

‘That’s a scandal’: CDC knew COVID shots caused deaths, but lied with public denials<\/h2>\n

May 1, 2024<\/p>\n

A new report from\u00a0the Epoch Times<\/a>\u00a0reveals its investigation shows that the CDC knew of the links between the COVID shots and death \u2013 and lied about them.<\/p>\n

The report explains officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention “found evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines caused multiple deaths before claiming that there was no evidence linking the vaccines to any deaths.”<\/p>\n

It was CDC employees who tracked down reports of deaths post-vaccination “and learned that myocarditis\u2014or heart inflammation, a confirmed side effect of the vaccines\u2014was listed on death certificates and in autopsies for some of the deaths.”\u00a0 …<\/p>\n

The Times explained “Myocarditis was also described as being caused by vaccination in a subset of the deaths. In other cases, the CDC workers found that deaths met the agency\u2019s definition for myocarditis, that the patients started showing symptoms within 42 days of a vaccine dose, and that the deceased displayed no virus-related symptoms. Officials say that after 42 days, a possible link between the vaccine and symptoms becomes tenuous, and they list post-vaccination deaths as unrelated if they can find any possible alternative causes.”<\/p>\n

But the report noted Dr. Clare Craig, a British pathologist, said in cases with the three features, it is absolutely safe to say the vaccines caused death.<\/p>\n

However, while the findings were determined by the end of 2021, the CDC in subsequent claims alleged it saw no signs linking the RNA and mRNA shots to deaths “reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.”<\/p>\n

Further, the CDC claimed in a letter to the Times in 2023 there were “no deaths reported to the VAERS for which the agency determined ‘the available evidence’ indicated Moderna or Pfizer vaccination ’caused or contributed to the deaths.'”<\/p>\n

The Times reported Dr. Andrew Bostom, accused the CDC of “concealing” deaths.<\/p>\n

“That\u2019s a scandal, where you have information like this and you continue to put out this dishonest line that there\u2019s only seven deaths and they\u2019re all unrelated to the mRNA vaccines.” …<\/p>\n

The report pointed out what has been stunning to some: in the U.S., people who die with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 cases are counted as COVID-19 deaths, including those who died from unrelated causes, and when the deaths happened years after the infection.<\/p>\n

Craig charged, “They are taking the exact opposite approach to COVID deaths! Every death after a test was a COVID death. No death after a vaccine is a vaccine death!” https:\/\/www.wnd.com\/2024\/05\/scandal-cdc-knew-covid-shots-caused-deaths-lied-public-denials\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The above is not a surprise.<\/p>\n

I repeatedly told people that I knew that the ‘experts’ were lying about COVID-vaccine safety. Plus, I often reported here that it was not possible to test them well enough the way that they were rushed through.<\/p>\n

Sadly, I was right.<\/p>\n

Let me add that back in January 2020, we put out a video pointing to the lab leak origin of the novel coronavirus,later named COVID-19 (watch Biological Warfare and Prophecy<\/a><\/span>). Then the ‘experts’ falsely claimed that to be a ‘”conspiracy theory.” Yet, that was also true.<\/p>\n

Last year, the Wall Street Journal<\/em> put out an article by Allysia Finley that begins with the following:<\/p>\n

\n

The Deceptive Campaign for Bivalent Covid Boosters<\/h2>\n

Studies show they fail to live up to their promise, but vaccine makers and experts keep pushing them.<\/h3>\n

January 22, 2023<\/p>\n

You might have heard a radio advertisement warning that if you\u2019ve had Covid, you could get it again and experience even worse symptoms. The message, sponsored by the Health and Human Services Department, claims that updated bivalent vaccines will improve your protection.<\/p>\n

This is deceptive advertising. But the public-health establishment\u2019s praise for the bivalent shots shouldn\u2019t come as a surprise. https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/the-deceptive-campaign-for-bivalent-covid-boosters-cdc-fda-biden-vaccines-moderna-pfizer-wuhan-imprinting-11674400955<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

ZeroHedge<\/em> posted the following about it:<\/p>\n

January 23, 2023<\/p>\n

The narrative behind the campaign was simple<\/strong>; mRNA Covid shots could simply be ‘tweaked’ to to target new variants – in this case, the jabs were claimed to confer protection against BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron variants, along with the original Wuhan strain.<\/p>\n

To call this wishful thinking would be extremely generous.<\/p>\n

As Finley writes, three scientific problems have arisen<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The virus is mutating much faster than vaccines can be updated.<\/li>\n
  2. Vaccines have ‘hard wired’ our immune systems to respond to the original Wuhan strain, “so we churn out fewer antibodies that neutralize variants targeted by updated vaccines.”<\/li>\n
  3. Antibody protection wanes after just a few months<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Finley has brought receipts too…<\/p>\n

    \n

    Two<\/a> studies<\/a> in the New England Journal of Medicine this month showed that bivalent boosters increase neutralizing antibodies against the BA.4 and BA.5 variants, but not significantly more than the original boosters<\/strong>. In one study, antibody levels after the bivalent boosters were 11 times as high against the Wuhan variant as BA.5.<\/em><\/p>\n

    The authors posit that immune imprinting \u201cmay pose a greater challenge than is currently appreciated for inducing robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 variants.\u201d<\/strong> This isn\u2019t unique to Covid or mRNA vaccines, though boosters may amplify the effect. Our first exposure as children to the flu\u2014whether by infection or vaccination\u2014affects our future response to different strains. -WSJ<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    For those who took (or were forced to take) the original vaccine, our memory B-cells were trained to produce antibodies against the original Wuhan strain<\/strong>. And as a New England Journal of Medicine article<\/a> notes, people who have taken said original vaccine were “primed” to respond to the Wuhan strain, and ‘mounted an inferior antibody response to other variants.’<\/strong><\/p>\n

    The studies directly contradict marketing information from Pfizer and Moderna<\/strong>, which asserted that the bivalent boosters produced a response to the new strains (BA.4 and BA.5) that’s 4-6x that of the original boosters – which the WSJ<\/em> says is “misleading.” …<\/p>\n

    Finley further notes that vaccine makers could have performed small, randomized trials<\/em><\/strong> last summer and early fall on the bivalents – with results available by the end of September. But the Biden administration didn’t want to wait<\/strong> (and now we know why).<\/p>\n

    \n

    The CDC published a study<\/a> in November that estimated the bivalents were only 22% to 43% effective against infection during the BA.5 wave<\/strong>\u2014their peak efficacy. As antibodies waned and new variants took over later in the fall, their protection against infection probably dropped to zero.<\/em><\/p>\n

    Another CDC study<\/a>, in December, reported that seniors who received bivalents were 84% less likely to be hospitalized than the unvaccinated, and 73% less likely than those who had received two or more doses of the original vaccine. But neither study controlled for important confounding factors\u2014for one, that the small minority who got bivalents were probably also more likely than those who hadn\u2019t to follow other Covid precautions or seek out treatments such as Paxlovid<\/strong>. -WSJ<\/em> https:\/\/www.zerohedge.com\/political\/wsj-shreds-vaccine-makers-biden-admin-over-deceptive-booster-campaign<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

    Notice also the following:<\/p>\n

    \n

    Moderna<\/a><\/span>\u00a0and the Food and Drug Association (FDA<\/a><\/span>) have been accused of concealing data during the approval process for the pharma giant\u2019s bivalent Covid booster.<\/p>\n

    Vaccine advisors who signed off on the updated shot late last year claim they were not shown trial data that indicated the booster was actually less effective at preventing Covid than the older vaccine it was meant to replace.<\/p>\n

    While the early trial results had substantial limitations, \u2018disappointed\u2019 and \u2018angry advisors say its omission from panel discussions shows a remarkable lack of transparency.<\/p>\n

    US taxpayers ended up shelling out nearly $5billion on the\u00a0new booster<\/a><\/span>, which was intended to enhance immunity against new variants. 01\/16\/23 https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/fda-and-cdc-advisors-accuse-moderna-of-withholding-trial-data-that-suggested-its-covid-bivalent-booster-was-less-effective-than-older-shot-to-secure-5bn-government-order\/<\/a><\/p>\n

    The more boosters you get, the more depressed your immune system becomes. That\u2019s why every time they inject you, it makes you more vulnerable to getting COVID.<\/p>\n

    Executive summary<\/h5>\n

    The data I\u2019ve been able to collect is consistent with the hypothesis that the more boosters you get, the worse the outcome.<\/p>\n

    Even the Moderna data was consistent with that.<\/p>\n

    Introduction<\/h5>\n

    I did a survey of hospitals<\/a>\u00a0on January 12, 2023 and\u00a0got 101 responses<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    Only one hospital, The Wayne Center (nursing home) Wayne PA, did they think the booster made things\u00a0slightly\u00a0<\/em>better. In 10 places, it made NO DIFFERENCE. Everywhere else, the reporters believed it made things worse.<\/span><\/p>\n

    In 71 places, they believed it made things MUCH WORSE.<\/p>\n

    But wait\u2026 didn\u2019t the government agencies say it\u00a0reduces\u00a0<\/em>your risk of death from COVID by 10X?<\/p>\n

    If that is true, then how come I can\u2019t find any nursing home in the world where that happened? 01\/19\/23 https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/they-forgot-to-tell-you-the-new-bivalent-vaccines-make-it-more-likely-youll-get-covid\/<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Yes, there was a lot of deceit associated with COVID as well as what to do about it.<\/p>\n

    The Bible shows that false statements, by those who do not love the truth, were expected to increase in these end times. Notice the following scriptures:<\/p>\n

    1 But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: \u2026 7 always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. (2 Timothy 3:1,7)<\/p>\n

    13 But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived. (2 Timothy 3:13, KJV)<\/p>\n

    18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness<\/strong> \u2026 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, (Romans 1:18,22)<\/p>\n

    20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: (1 Timothy 6:20, KJV)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Yes, the Bible warns of lies, suppression of truth, not realizing truth, and false oppositions called science.<\/p>\n

    More and more in the USA government, which is SUPPOSED to stand for freedom of speech, have called for suppression of free speech related to matters, such as COVID.<\/p>\n

    We have seen that much of this related to COVID-19 has caused great harm to the world.<\/p>\n

    There is a major cost for suppression of truth.<\/p>\n

    That being said, the response to COVID by many governmental authorities was also not based on science but on a fear-promoting agenda as well as various financial interests.<\/p>\n

    The Bible warns:<\/p>\n

    10<\/sup> For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evil, for which some have strayed from the faith in their greediness, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows. (1 Timothy 6:10)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Related to a COVID variant, a major proponent of Big Pharma in the USA, Dr. Anthony Fauci, proclaimed:<\/p>\n

    \u201cIf you want to be fully protected, get boosted\u201d (12\/30\/21 https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/news\/anthony-fauci-covid-vaccine-booster-omicron\/<\/a>)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    That was, and is, scientifically inaccurate. Humanly speaking, the way to be \u201cfully protected\u201d is to be far away from any who may have been exposed\u2013many who have gotten the COVID-boosters have still gotten some version of COVID. The major media and Big Tech should be pointing out that this was wrong, but it has tended to shy away from that, but instead points to Dr. Fauci as a \u201creliable source.\u201d<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    Yes, I lay a lot of the blame for misinformation and lies about COVID at the door of the government of the USA and Dr. Fauci.<\/p>\n

    Much information has been suppressed.<\/p>\n

    Information from the USA and UK was used by governments around the world. I believe that various ones in Europe will one day point to false information from the USA, UK, and their vaccine makers as an example of why they cannot be trusted.<\/p>\n

    And we also saw Big Tech get involved in promoting lies and suppressing the truth.<\/p>\n

    In September of 2020, Facebook took down a post where I explained information about nutrition, Dr. Fauci, and COVID that the USA was not telling people. A version of that referenced article is, however, still available at the following non-Facebook-related link: COVID interview: Dr. Fauci takes isolated vitamin D and synthetic vitamin C<\/a>.<\/p>\n

    At risk of repeat, because I dared to state that vaccines and other pharmaceuticals were not the only answer, in November 2021 YouTube retroactively removed a video we in the Continuing<\/em> Church of God put up, back in February 2021. Here is a link to it from another platform: COVID-19: Eat what is good!<\/a> When I tried to appeal to YouTube, it never once said I made an inaccurate or false statement. It claimed that the video did not have the \u201cconsensus of local experts\u201d or the World Health Organization (WHO). Truth was not important to the YouTube censors.<\/p>\n

    Here is a list of items that the YouTube-censored video I produced promoted:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. People should decrease their consumption of junk food. Instead that has increased and many Americans have gained unhealthy weight (see Using scale for weight loss? Americans gain weight during COVID-19 shut downs<\/a>) which will not bolster their innate or adaptive immune systems.<\/li>\n
    2. Exercise is beneficial for the immune system (watch The Plain Truth About Exercise<\/a>), yet during the corona\/COVID lockdowns, many have gotten less exercise. Some because of fear of going outside and some because many gyms have been closed by government orders. Yet, the Bible teaches \u2018bodily exercise profits a little\u2019 (1 Timothy 4:8).<\/li>\n
    3. Avoiding smoking (see also Should Christians Smoke Tobacco or Marijuana?<\/a>) and polluted air (watch Air Pollution, Autism, and Prophecy<\/span><\/a>) help the immune function. Yet, cigarette purchases in the USA went up last year during the COVID lockdowns.<\/li>\n
    4. People should increase their consumption of high vitamin C fruits (like citrus and berries) and vegetables (like tomatoes and bell peppers) as vitamin C is proven to bolster the immune system, help protect tissues (like lungs), and fight viruses (see also COVID-19 and Vitamin C: The truth, the myth, and the hype<\/a>). Many also contain fruits and vegetables supply betacarotene, which also supports the immune system.<\/li>\n
    5. Eleven years ago it was reported in a scientific journal that zinc was effective against coronaviruses to reduce their replication (see\u2018CDC Triples Number of Possible CCP Virus Symptoms;\u2019 Don\u2019t swallow Lysol to fight COVID-19! What about Zinc? Bloodclots?<\/a>). Various foods, like pumpkin seeds, contain zinc.<\/li>\n
    6. Selenium may also be helpful. Eating a couple of Brazil nuts per week can supply adequate amounts of selenium.<\/li>\n
    7. Substances like methylene blue and hydroxychloroquine help improve zinc absorption (see also Donald Trump taking zinc and hydroxychloroquine to prevent COVID-19: Mainstream media aghast! Vitamin D? Vitamin C?<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    8. Sunlight helps convert cholesterol into vitamin D and vitamin D looks to be helpful for those facing the coronavirus (see Donald Trump taking zinc and hydroxychloroquine to prevent COVID-19: Mainstream media aghast! Vitamin D? Vitamin C?<\/a>). Even the CDC\u2019s Dr. Fauci has admitted that vitamins D and C can be helpful (see COVID interview: Dr. Fauci takes isolated vitamin D and synthetic vitamin C<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    9. Many herbs can help with viruses (see \u2018Ghanaians Look to Herbal Remedies for COVID-19\u2019 \u2018Enti wob\u0511di Onyankop\u2184n Nna Kronkron anaa Ahonhomm\u2184nee Ahomegye\u0511 Nna?\u2019<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    10. Jesus said His followers would fast (Mark 2:20). Fasting boosts the immune system (see Reuters: Why is New Orleans\u2019 coronavirus death rate seven times New York\u2019s? Obesity is a factor; BNP: \u2018How to Change Your Life in 5 Seconds\u2019<\/a>). Fasting, for those who can, can truly help the immune system (see Fasting aids longevity and provides other benefits<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    11. Blood clots can be destructive and even deadly with COVID-19, hence people who get COVID-19 may wish to take nattokinase (see \u2018CDC Triples Number of Possible CCP Virus Symptoms;\u2019 Don\u2019t swallow Lysol to fight COVID-19! What about Zinc? Bloodclots?<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    12. Lung tissue damage is associated with COVID-19 and bovine lung tissue helps support healthy lungs (see CBS: Blood types may play role in which COVID patients get sickest; Isaiah: Eat what is good.<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    13. People should avoid consuming biblically unclean meat (see The New Testament Church, History, and Unclean Meats<\/a><\/span>), which look to have been implicated in the cause of COVID-19 (see NPR: Where Did The Coronavirus Originate? Virus Hunters Find Genetic Clues In Bats; WND: Biblically unclean animals responsible for pandemics<\/a> and Clean and unclean meat arguments, COVID-19, and the Bible<\/a>).<\/li>\n
    14. Humans can help maintain healthy kidneys and other organs with bovine kidney and other organ tissues (see https:\/\/doctorsresearch.com\/articles\/2759\/the-truth-about-glandulars-in-nutritional-supplements\/<\/a>). Plural glandular supplements can be helpful.<\/li>\n
    15. Even vaccine advocates think that the rushed vaccine will have safety risks (e.g. https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2020\/jun\/22\/trump-circle-pressure-fda-rush-covid-19-vaccine-election<\/a>)\u2013hence caution and wisdom are advised.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      There were, and still are, ways to boost the immune system is a healthy way.<\/p>\n

      The first 14 above have the potential to help support one\u2019s innate immune system, which helps the body fight many types of pathogens\u2013not just one. The 15th one, which I also posted before, is being proven also to be factual. Notice some concerns about suspected health impacts related to the vaccines and boosters:<\/p>\n

      The\u00a0Centers for Disease Control and Prevention<\/a>\u00a0(CDC) announced Friday that it has launched an \u201cadditional investigation\u201d into\u00a0Pfizer<\/a>\u2019s updated COVID booster after a government safety monitoring system detected a potential stroke risk for those 65 and older who 01\/16\/23 https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/tag\/pfizers-updated-covid-booster-linked-to-potential-stroke-risk\/<\/a><\/p>\n

      Covid boosters appear to be causing cancers.<\/p>\n

      There follows the transcript of a\u00a0new video<\/a>\u00a0put out by top cancer specialist Dr. Angus Dalgleish, who is very concerned that the Covid boosters appear to be causing cancers, an adverse effect which he says \u201cdoes not look like a coincidence\u201d.<\/strong><\/em> 01\/08\/23 https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/top-cancer-expert-aggressive-cancers-appearing-after-vaccine-boosters-not-a-coincidence\/<\/a><\/p>\n

      Writer and former\u00a0New York Times<\/i>\u00a0reporter Alex Berenson says he\u00a0has in his possession<\/a>\u00a0evidence from a study showing that covid \u201cbooster\u201d vaccines push the immune system over the edge, causing an almost total collapse of immune function.<\/p>\n

      In a series of tweets, Berenson wrote that based on the study\u2019s findings, no more booster shots should go into any arms. (Related: Here\u2019s\u00a0more proof<\/a>\u00a0that covid injections cause AIDS.)<\/p>\n

      \u201cBoosters need to be halted immediately. HALTED. IMMEDIATELY. Stack coming,\u201d Berenson wrote, Stack referring to his Substack blog. \u201cThere\u2019s a new paper. It\u2019s bad. How bad? I\u2019ve shown it to two physicians so far. One said he \u2018had a seizure\u2019 reading it. The other said something worse.\u201d 01\/22\/23 https:\/\/www.sgtreport.com\/2023\/01\/getting-vaccinated-for-covid-four-or-more-times-results-in-near-complete-collapse-of-the-immune-system-bombshell-study-finds\/<\/a><\/p>\n

      \n