{"id":92,"date":"2007-08-17T06:12:44","date_gmt":"2007-08-17T14:12:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/cog-news\/another-ucg-doctrinal-change\/"},"modified":"2007-08-17T06:21:52","modified_gmt":"2007-08-17T14:21:52","slug":"another-ucg-doctrinal-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cogwriter.com\/news\/cog-news\/another-ucg-doctrinal-change\/","title":{"rendered":"Another UCG Doctrinal Change?"},"content":{"rendered":"

A long-time reader of the <\/em>www.cogwriter.com<\/em><\/a> page, who is not a member of the Living Church of God, sent me the following (note the “me” or “my” below is from the one who wrote the following–it was not by COGwriter<\/a>–my comments, which follow,\u00a0are\u00a0all in italics) and asked me to post it:<\/em><\/p>\n

The United Church of God has recently come out with a new booklet on \u201cThe New Covenant \u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Does It Abolish God\u2019s Law?\u201d \u00a9 2007\u00a0 <\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

This booklet is quite lengthy (160 + pages) and seems to cover a lot of things to explain the new covenant, plus other various subjects. <\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

The question some have is this: does this new book promote long time teachings of the Church or has it come up with new ones unique to this era of Laodicea? It makes this observation on page 20, Quoted with my own emphasis: <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

\u201c<\/span>The prophets became God\u2019s spokesmen<\/strong>. The messages they received from God, often written in books for later generations, were to be obeyed as \u201cthe word of the Lord\u201d <\/em><\/strong>(see Isaiah 8:\u00a0 <\/span>Jeremiah 1: -5; Ezekiel 6:1- ). This same authority was later given to Christ\u2019s apostles<\/u><\/em><\/strong> (Acts: 9- 1).\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

This seems to fail to acknowledge Herbert W. Armstrong as an apostle<\/u><\/em><\/strong> of Jesus Christ with this same kind of authority,<\/em><\/strong> as one who restored truth to the Church.\u00a0 <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/span>Let me give another quote from the book, and then explain what I am saying. Below are a couple more quotes from this book on page 157:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cHaving agreed to the New Covenant, the Church<\/u><\/em><\/strong> is now betrothed to Christ (2 Cor. 11:2). It is under the terms of the New Covenant but still awaiting the coming fullness<\/em><\/strong> of the New Covenant marriage to begin<\/em><\/strong> at \u201cthe marriage of the Lamb\u201d (Revelation 19:6-9).<\/span>All mankind brought into that relationship<\/span><\/strong>\u2014\u201cyet God intends to offer this marriage relationship<\/u><\/em><\/strong> to all human beings.\u201d<\/span>\u201cWhen Jesus returns and joins into the fullness<\/em><\/strong> of marriage with His Church<\/strong>, He will then also<\/em><\/strong> extend His engagement proposal to all mankind<\/em><\/strong>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAnd as all of mankind<\/em><\/strong> is brought into this relationship,\u201d—<\/span>This teaching would virtually make all mankind equal, if they are to all<\/u><\/em><\/strong> be married to Christ and experience the \u201cMarriage relationship\u201d.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

Below is what HWA taught on this subject of the marriage relationship and Bride of Christ:<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

<\/span>\u201cNotice again: “To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my father in his throne” (Rev. 3:21). Those who shall reign<\/strong> WITH Christ, when He comes to restore the GOVERNMENT OF GOD, MUST OVERCOME (and that includes overcoming SATAN), EVEN AS JESUS DID!\u00a0 <\/span>Now does this apply equally<\/u><\/em><\/strong> to those who shall be converted after<\/u><\/em><\/strong> Christ comes, during the Millennium? \u00a0<\/span>The answer is NO<\/u><\/em><\/strong>! These– quotations are found in Jesus’ message to the seven CHURCHES that span this CHURCH<\/em><\/strong> AGE<\/strong>! They do NOT apply<\/u><\/em><\/strong> to those called later!\u201d <\/strong><\/span>(Page 158, the top section\u2014From <\/span>THE <\/span><\/strong>INCREDIBLE HUMAN POTENTIAL<\/strong><\/span> \u00a9 1978\u2014FIRST EDITION\u2014SPECIAL COMMEMORATIVE EDITION<\/span>\u2014<\/span>Handed out at the F.o.T<\/span>.\u2014<\/span>with<\/span> <\/span>some emphasis added.)<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

H.W.A. says this also from page 160, same book:<\/span> <\/font><\/p>\n

\n

\u201cBut the KINGDOM of God is BOTH the GOVERNMENT of God and the FAMILY of God. Those now being saved spiritually will, in the resurrection, INHERIT the\n<\/place>\n<\/placetype>Kingdom of\n<\/placename>God. They shall have been BORN of God — born into the Divine FAMILY of God. They shall be married to Christ.<\/em><\/strong> Of this divine spiritual marriage<\/em><\/strong>, children of God<\/u><\/em><\/strong> will be begotten<\/u><\/em><\/strong> and born<\/u><\/em><\/strong> spiritually all during<\/u><\/em><\/strong> the thousand years commencing with Christ’s return to earth as KING.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

<\/span>Mr. Armstrong said this same thing many times and wrote in other writings, reiterating that the bride<\/u><\/em><\/strong> would bring forth children<\/u><\/em><\/strong>. He died without changing this teaching which is based on several different passages of scripture. <\/span><\/p>\n

It certainly appears that UCG has come up with a new teaching that is unique to its own organization, which veers away from previous teachings of an apostle of Jesus Christ. Are they right or wrong? \u00a0<\/span>Is this based solidly on scripture? You, the reader have to\u00a0decide.<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>While I (COGwriter<\/font><\/a>) have found certain aspects of The New Covenant\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Does It Abolish God\u2019s Law? helpful (though misleading in at least one place), I do not intend to comment on the above other than to state that UCG has made a lot of changes in doctrine, and of course, governance.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>Those interested in some of what UCG teaches and what it changed may wish to read one or both of the following articles:<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

<\/span>Differences between the Living Church of God and United Church of God<\/em><\/font><\/a> This article provides quotes information from the two largest groups which had their origins in WCG as well as commentary.
\n<\/em><\/font>In Their Own Words: Doctrinal Differences Between the old United Church of God and the old Global Church of God<\/em><\/font><\/a> Older quotes from the leadership and some of the membership of these two organizations are included without added commentary (until the end and the 7\/31\/98 update) which highlighted some of the differences between them.<\/em><\/font><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A long-time reader of the www.cogwriter.com page, who is not a member of the Living Church of God, sent me the following (note the “me” or “my” below is from the one who wrote the following–it was not by COGwriter–my comments, which follow,\u00a0are\u00a0all in italics) and asked me to post it: The United Church of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cog-news"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t